Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/110741
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorHu, Q-
dc.creatorXiong, F-
dc.creatorShen, GQ-
dc.creatorLiu, R-
dc.creatorXue, J-
dc.creatorWu, H-
dc.creatorZhou, X-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-21T06:23:02Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-21T06:23:02Z-
dc.identifier.issn0360-1323-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/110741-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.subjectDual principal–Agent modelen_US
dc.subjectGreen building promotionen_US
dc.subjectIncentive mechanismen_US
dc.subjectInformation asymmetryen_US
dc.subjectMulti-Level governanceen_US
dc.titleIncentive mechanism design for promoting high-quality green buildings in China's multi-level governance systemen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume269-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112358-
dcterms.abstractThis study develops optimal policy incentive mechanisms to promote high-quality green buildings (GBs) within China's multi-level governance (MLG) system, addressing key challenges of information asymmetry between the central government, local government and developer. A dual principal–agent model is employed to design incentive mechanisms for both government levels across non-collusion and collusion scenarios. Comparative and numerical analyses reveal that these mechanisms enable the central government to effectively mitigate the adverse impacts of collusion and information asymmetry, ensuring consistent GB quality, environmental benefits, and social welfare, while avoiding excessive fiscal burdens. Despite collusion, the central government maintains optimal incentive intensity, while the local government screens information and incentivises developers through tailored incentive mechanisms, distinguishing between low- and high-cost developers. Both high- and low-cost developers are driven to improve GB quality, with the latter contributing greater green efforts. This study provides actionable insights for policymakers to balance fiscal sustainability and environmental goals in promoting high-quality GB development within the MLG context, offering a useful reference for countries with similar policy agendas.-
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBuilding and environment, 1 Feb. 2025, v. 269, 112358-
dcterms.isPartOfBuilding and environment-
dcterms.issued2025-02-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85211165941-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-684X-
dc.identifier.artn112358-
dc.description.validate202501 bcrc-
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3362en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID49992en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-02-01en_US
dc.description.TAGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-02-01
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.