Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/110728
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of English and Communicationen_US
dc.creatorFarangi, MRen_US
dc.creatorNejadghanbar, Hen_US
dc.creatorHu, Gen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-16T03:47:10Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-16T03:47:10Z-
dc.identifier.issn1050-8422en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/110728-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.rights© 2024 Taylor & Francis Group, LLCen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Ethics & Behavior on 25 Oct 2024 (published online), available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2024.2420133.en_US
dc.subjectChatGPTen_US
dc.subjectEmotional reactions to AIen_US
dc.subjectEthical concerns with AIen_US
dc.subjectGenAIen_US
dc.subjectResearchen_US
dc.titleUse of generative AI in research : ethical considerations and emotional experiencesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage527en_US
dc.identifier.epage543en_US
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10508422.2024.2420133en_US
dcterms.abstractThis study examines researchers’ ethical concerns toward the deployment of GenAI in research and their emotional responses. To acquire an in-depth understanding, we used narrative frames and follow-up interviews to collect data from 22 researchers who reported extensive experience with GenAI. An inductive thematic analysis revealed three themes capturing ethical concerns that invoked three types of emotional reactions. From an ethical perspective, our participants were concerned with “human ethical agency in AI research practices,” “cognitive impacts of overreliance on GenAI in research,” and “ethical issues of access, accuracy, and privacy.” From an emotional perspective, they showed “mixed emotions,” “positive emotions,” and “negative emotions” when dealing with GenAI tools. There were close connections between the ethical implications of GenAI and the emotional reactions to them. In this light, we conclude that emotional reactions to GenAI, which are determinants of future use, should be taken more seriously in further research.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEthics & behavior, 2025, v. 35, no. 7, p. 527-543en_US
dcterms.isPartOfEthics & behavioren_US
dcterms.issued2025-
dc.identifier.eissn1532-7019en_US
dc.description.validate202501 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3244-
dc.identifier.SubFormID49832-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Farangi_Use_Generative_AI.pdfPre-Published version1.66 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

38
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.