Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/110706
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studiesen_US
dc.creatorYao, Yen_US
dc.creatorSun, Yen_US
dc.creatorZhu, Sen_US
dc.creatorZhu, Xen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-14T02:35:13Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-14T02:35:13Z-
dc.identifier.issn0141-8211en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/110706-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.en_US
dc.rights© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Education published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Yao, Y., Sun, Y., Zhu, S. and Zhu, X. (2025), A Qualitative Inquiry Into Metacognitive Strategies of Postgraduate Students in Employing ChatGPT for English Academic Writing. Eur J Educ, 60: e12824 is available at https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12824.en_US
dc.subjectChatGPTen_US
dc.subjectEnglish academic writingen_US
dc.subjectMetacognitive strategiesen_US
dc.subjectQualitative researchen_US
dc.titleA qualitative inquiry into metacognitive strategies of postgraduate students in employing ChatGPT for English academic writingen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume60en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ejed.12824en_US
dcterms.abstractRecent years have witnessed a growing application of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technology in writing instruction. Students should mobilise their metacognitive strategies during this endeavour to maximise the benefits of GenAI while avoiding the potential negative impacts. Within the context of tertiary education in Hong Kong, this qualitative research investigates 13 postgraduate students' metacognitive strategies when utilising ChatGPT for English academic writing. Using data collected from audio recordings, semi-structured interviews and human–GenAI chat logs, we explored students' metacognitive strategies within five dimensions, namely, planning, monitoring, evaluating, information management and debugging. The identified themes and subthemes within each dimension exhibited similarities to those observed in other educational settings. Meanwhile, certain metacognitive strategies (e.g., debugging) were found to be unique to the context of GenAI-supported academic writing. This study contributes to the literature in two ways. Firstly, it provides a detailed and thorough understanding of metacognitive strategies, complementing the extensive quantitative research in this area. Secondly, this research expands the framework of metacognitive strategies to the context of GenAI-supported academic writing learning.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEuropean journal of education, Mar. 2025, v. 60, no. 1, e12824en_US
dcterms.isPartOfEuropean journal of educationen_US
dcterms.issued2025-03-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85208188876-
dc.identifier.eissn1465-3435en_US
dc.identifier.artne12824en_US
dc.description.validate202501 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_TA, a3943c-
dc.identifier.SubFormID51769-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.TAWiley (2024)en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryTAen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Yao_Qualitative_Inquiry_Metacognitive.pdf926.1 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

42
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

32
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

22
Citations as of Apr 3, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.