Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/110408
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.contributorSchool of Nursingen_US
dc.creatorChan, WLSen_US
dc.creatorTsang, SMHen_US
dc.creatorHo, LYWen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-10T04:12:02Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-10T04:12:02Z-
dc.identifier.issn0885-6230en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/110408-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd.en_US
dc.subjectClinical assessmenten_US
dc.subjectDementiaen_US
dc.subjectFallsen_US
dc.subjectStepping performanceen_US
dc.titleReliability and validity of four step tests in older adults with dementiaen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/gps.70021en_US
dcterms.abstractObjectives: To determine the test–retest and inter-rater reliability, concurrent and discriminative validity of the Four Square Step Test (FSST), the Choice Stepping Reaction Time Test (CSRTT), the Maximum Step Length Test (MSLT), and the Alternate Step Test (AST) in older adults with dementia.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethods: Thirty-seven older adults with dementia who could walk independently for at least 10 m were recruited at community centers and day care centers for older adults. The participants completed the step tests conducted by two independent raters on three separate testing occasions within 3 weeks. In addition, the physical and cognitive function of the participants were evaluated at baseline.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: The FSST, CSRTT, and MSLT showed good-to-excellent test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.83–0.91), and the AST exhibited fair test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.70). All the step tests showed good-to-excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.75–0.94). The step tests had moderate-to-strong correlations with various physical and cognitive measures (Pearson correlation coefficients = 0.34–0.72). The MSLT side step and AST could differentiate between individuals who did and did not use a walking stick to ambulate (p ≤ 0.046). The FSST, CSRTT, and AST could differentiate between individuals with and without a major neurocognitive impairment (p ≤ 0.005).en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusion: The FSST, CSRTT, and MSLT were reliable and valid for examining the stepping performance of older adults with dementia. Clinicians can use these tests to evaluate the physical and cognitive function of this population and identify those with significant cognitive impairment.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry, Dec. 2024, v. 39, no. 12, e70021en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of geriatric psychiatryen_US
dcterms.issued2024-12-
dc.identifier.eissn1099-1166en_US
dc.identifier.artne70021en_US
dc.description.validate202412 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3313-
dc.identifier.SubFormID49914-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2025-12-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2025-12-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

58
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.