A comparative study of transcranial color-coded doppler (TCCD) and transcranial doppler (TCD) ultrasonography techniques in assessing the intracranial cerebral arteries haemodynamics

Abstract

Cerebrovascular disease (CVD) poses a major public health and socio-economic burden worldwide due to its high morbidity and mortality rates. Accurate assessment of cerebral arteries’ haemodynamic plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and treatment management of CVD. The study compared a non-imaging transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) and transcranial color-coded Doppler ultrasound (with (cTCCD) and without (ncTCCD)) angle correction in quantifying middle cerebral arteries (MCAs) haemodynamic parameters. A cross-sectional study involving 50 healthy adults aged ≥ 18 years was conducted. The bilateral MCAs were insonated via three trans-temporal windows (TTWs—anterior, middle, and posterior) using TCD, cTCCD, and ncTCCD techniques. The MCA peak systolic velocity (PSV) and mean flow velocity (MFV) were recorded at proximal and distal imaging depths that could be visualised on TCCD with a detectable spectral waveform. A total of 152 measurements were recorded in 41 (82%) subjects with at least one-sided open TTW across the three techniques. The mean PSVs measured using TCD, ncTCCD, and cTCCD were 83 ± 18 cm/s, 81 ± 19 cm/s, and 93 ± 21 cm/s, respectively. There was no significant difference in PSV between TCD and ncTCCD (bias = 2 cm/s, p = 1.000), whereas cTCCD yielded a significantly higher PSV than TCD and ncTCCD (bias = −10 cm/s, p < 0.001; bias = −12 cm/s, p ≤ 0.001, respectively). The bias in MFV between TCD and ncTCCD techniques was (bias = −0.5 cm/s; p = 1.000), whereas cTCCD demonstrated a higher MFV compared to TCD and ncTCCD (bias = −8 cm/s, p < 0.001; bias = −8 cm/s, p ≤ 0.001, respectively). TCCD is a practically applicable imaging technique in assessing MCA blood flow velocities. cTCCD is more accurate and tends to give higher MCA blood flow velocities than non-imaging TCD and ncTCCD techniques. ncTCCD is comparable to non-imaging TCD and should be considered in clinical cases where using both TCD and TCCD measurements is needed.