Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/110067
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
dc.contributorSchool of Nursing-
dc.creatorHo, LYW-
dc.creatorLai, CKY-
dc.creatorNg, SSM-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-20T07:31:44Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-20T07:31:44Z-
dc.identifier.issn1441-0745-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/110067-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.en_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the originalwork is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.en_US
dc.rights© 2024 The Author(s). Nursing & Health Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Ho, L. ., Lai, C. . and Ng, S. . (2024), Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index: Test–Retest Reliability and Agreement in People With Stroke. Nurs Health Sci., 26: e13191 is available at https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.13191.en_US
dc.subjectCardio-ankle vascular indexen_US
dc.subjectFatigueen_US
dc.subjectSleep qualityen_US
dc.subjectStrokeen_US
dc.subjectVascular stiffnessen_US
dc.titleCardio-ankle vascular index : test-retest reliability and agreement in people with strokeen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume26-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nhs.13191-
dcterms.abstractThe cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) is superior to traditional methods of measuring arterial stiffness. However, its application in clinical practice has lagged behind the science. This study aimed to (1) examine its test–retest reliability and agreement between repeated measurements, (2) identify the correlation with fatigue and sleep quality, and (3) compare the CAVI values of the bilateral sides of people with stroke, and those of stroke survivors with and without fatigue. Participants (n = 67) were assessed using the CAVI, Fatigue Assessment Scale, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The test–retest reliability ranged from 0.77 to 0.86. The Bland–Altman plots showed good agreement between test and retest. The standard error of measurement ranged from 0.59 to 0.66. The minimal detectable change ranged from 1.15 to 1.29. The CAVI values of the bilateral sides correlated with fatigue and those at the paretic side correlated with sleep quality. The CAVI values of the paretic side were higher than those of the non-paretic side in people with stroke. Stroke participants with fatigue had higher CAVI values than those without fatigue. CAVI has good test–retest reliability and agreement between repeated measurements for clinical use.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNursing and health sciences, Dec. 2024, v. 26, no. 4, e13191-
dcterms.isPartOfNursing and health sciences-
dcterms.issued2024-12-
dc.identifier.eissn1442-2018-
dc.identifier.artne13191-
dc.description.validate202411 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_TAen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.TAWiley (2024)en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryTAen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ho_Cardio‐Ankle_Vascular_Index.pdf1.63 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.