Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/110047
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering-
dc.creatorLyu, HM-
dc.creatorYin, ZY-
dc.creatorHicher, PY-
dc.creatorLaouafa, F-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-20T07:31:03Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-20T07:31:03Z-
dc.identifier.issn1674-9871-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/110047-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.rights© 2024 China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of China University of Geosciences (Beijing). This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Lyu, H.-M., Yin, Z.-Y., Hicher, P.-Y., & Laouafa, F. (2024). Incorporating mitigation strategies in machine learning for landslide susceptibility prediction. Geoscience Frontiers, 15(5), 101869 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101869.en_US
dc.subjectLandslide susceptibilityen_US
dc.subjectMachine learningen_US
dc.subjectMitigation strategiesen_US
dc.subjectSpatial predictionen_US
dc.titleIncorporating mitigation strategies in machine learning for landslide susceptibility predictionen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume15-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101869-
dcterms.abstractThis study proposes an approach that considers mitigation strategies in predicting landslide susceptibility through machine learning (ML) and geographic information system (GIS) techniques. ML models, such as random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and support vector classification (SVC) are incorporated into GIS to predict landslide susceptibilities in Hong Kong. To consider the effect of mitigation strategies on landslide susceptibility, non-landslide samples were produced in the upgraded area and added to randomly created samples to serve as ML models in training datasets. Two scenarios were created to compare and demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed approach; Scenario I does not considering landslide control while Scenario II considers mitigation strategies for landslide control. The largest landslide susceptibilities are 0.967 (from RF), followed by 0.936 (from LR) and 0.902 (from SVC) in Scenario II; in Scenario I, they are 0.986 (from RF), 0.955 (from LR) and 0.947 (from SVC). This proves that the ML models considering mitigation strategies can decrease the current landslide susceptibilities. The comparison between the different ML models shows that RF performed better than LR and SVC, and provides the best prediction of the spatial distribution of landslide susceptibilities.-
dcterms.abstractGraphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGeoscience frontiers, Sept 2024, v. 15, no. 5, 101869-
dcterms.isPartOfGeoscience frontiers-
dcterms.issued2024-09-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85194904127-
dc.identifier.eissn2588-9192-
dc.identifier.artn101869-
dc.description.validate202411 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextNational Natural Science Foundation of China; Hong Kong Polytechnic University Strategic Importance Fund; Project of Research Institute of Land and Spaceen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S1674987124000938-main.pdf7.48 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

44
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

6
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
Citations as of Sep 12, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.