Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/110038
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciences-
dc.creatorZhao, Y-
dc.creatorRogers, S-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-20T07:30:58Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-20T07:30:58Z-
dc.identifier.issn0305-750X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/110038-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Zhao, Y., & Rogers, S. (2024). Tracing China’s agrochemical complex. World Development, 181, 106675 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106675.en_US
dc.subjectChemical geographiesen_US
dc.subjectExportsen_US
dc.subjectFertilizersen_US
dc.subjectGlobal Chinaen_US
dc.subjectPesticide studiesen_US
dc.titleTracing China’s agrochemical complexen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume181-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106675-
dcterms.abstractChinese firms, both private and state-owned, have transformed the global agrochemical complex. China dominates exports of pesticides (particularly herbicides) and various kinds of nitrogen- and phosphorous-based fertilisers. And yet the precise nature of this transformation is poorly understood: where are Chinese agrochemicals made and by whom; in what ways is domestic production changing; which actors are active in the export market; and what is flowing where? In this article we begin to flesh out some of the detail of China’s massive agrochemical complex and its internal dynamics by examining key actors and flows in China’s agrochemical export industry. Our analysis is framed by insights drawn from the Global China literature and from pesticide studies. We find two distinct industries, both of which are in flux. Domestic environmental regulations and industry upgrading are reconfiguring the landscape for mining and chemical production, resulting in a scaling back of pesticide and fertiliser production, while mergers and acquisitions are concentrating production and export capacity in particular firms. Export flows are nonetheless growing in a generally favourable export environment. Concealed in the generic categories ‘pesticide’ and ‘fertiliser’ is the fact that different products go to different destinations and do so in patterns that complicate North-South categories. Our analysis highlights the need for new commodity geographies of Chinese-made agrochemicals that can account for production, circulation, and use.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWorld development, Sept 2024, v. 181, 106675-
dcterms.isPartOfWorld development-
dcterms.issued2024-09-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85194945476-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5991-
dc.identifier.artn106675-
dc.description.validate202411 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextAustralian Research Councilen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.