Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/110034
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorEnglish Language Centre-
dc.contributorEducational Development Centre-
dc.creatorFoung, D-
dc.creatorLin, L-
dc.creatorChen, J-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-20T07:30:57Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-20T07:30:57Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/110034-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Foung, D., Lin, L., & Chen, J. (2024). Reinventing assessments with ChatGPT and other online tools: Opportunities for GenAI-empowered assessment practices. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100250 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100250.en_US
dc.subjectAssessmentsen_US
dc.subjectGenAIen_US
dc.subjectLanguage learningen_US
dc.subjectOnline toolsen_US
dc.titleReinventing assessments with ChatGPT and other online tools : opportunities for GenAI-empowered assessment practicesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume6-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100250-
dcterms.abstractThe recent emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools, such as ChatGPT, has brought profound changes to higher education. While many studies have examined the potential use of ChatGPT in teaching and learning, few have explored the opportunities to develop assessments that facilitate the use of multiple technological innovations (i.e. traditional AI and GenAI tools). We conducted qualitative research to address this gap. The assessments of an elective English course in Hong Kong were re-designed to incorporate GenAI and other tools. Students were asked to employ and reflect on their use of these tools for their writing assessments. We analyzed the written reflections of 74 students and conducted focus group interviews with 28 students. The results suggest that the students possess an acumen for choosing the appropriate online tools for specific purposes. When they can choose freely, they develop skills that allow them to evaluate and select between traditional AI and GenAI tools when appropriate. Some students mentioned concerns with the different features of the free and premium versions. The results of this study call for (1) assessment practices that allow the flexibility to use different AI tools and (2) the equitable use of various AI tools.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationComputers & education. Artificial intelligence, June 2024, v. 6, 100250-
dcterms.isPartOfComputers & education. Artificial intelligence-
dcterms.issued2024-06-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85195263113-
dc.identifier.eissn2666-920X-
dc.identifier.artn100250-
dc.description.validate202411 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S2666920X24000535-main.pdf447.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.