Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/109946
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering-
dc.creatorFung, KC-
dc.creatorXue, KW-
dc.creatorLai, CM-
dc.creatorLin, KH-
dc.creatorLam, KM-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-20T07:30:29Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-20T07:30:29Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/109946-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.rights© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Fung, K. C., Xue, K.-W., Lai, C.-M., Lin, K.-H., & Lam, K.-M. (2024). Improving PCB defect detection using selective feature attention and pixel shuffle pyramid. Results in Engineering, 21, 101992 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101992.en_US
dc.subjectConvolution neural networken_US
dc.subjectMultiscale feature fusionen_US
dc.subjectObject detectionen_US
dc.subjectPCB defect detectionen_US
dc.titleImproving PCB defect detection using selective feature attention and pixel shuffle pyramiden_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume21-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101992-
dcterms.abstractDue to the ongoing miniaturization of electronic products and the use of miniature printed circuit boards (PCBs), existing AI-based defect detection methods have exhibited poor performance in detecting tiny PCB defects. This issue can potentially compromise safety, degrade manufacturing quality, and increase production costs. To tackle this problem, we propose two novel techniques for PCB defect detection, namely Selective Feature Attention (SF attention) and Pixel Shuffle Pyramid (PSPyramid). SF attention identifies important features from a pyramid feature map to fuse the semantic and spatial information, while PSPyramid effectively fuses semantic features to detect various types of defects on PCBs, especially tiny defects. Moreover, a customized training strategy, specifically for PCB defect detection, is devised. To evaluate the performance of our proposed algorithms, extensive experiments have been conducted on two well-known PCB datasets containing tiny defects: the DeepPCB and TDD datasets. Our proposed non-referential method achieves performance comparable to existing referential methods on the DeepPCB dataset, making it more feasible for industrial applications. Compared to state-of-the-art methods, our method reduces the error by 16%, in terms of AP50, on the TDD dataset. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method in improving the quality assurance process for PCBs in the electronics industry.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationResults in engineering, Mar. 2024, v. 21, 101992-
dcterms.isPartOfResults in engineering-
dcterms.issued2024-03-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85187207383-
dc.identifier.eissn2590-1230-
dc.identifier.artn101992-
dc.description.validate202411 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S2590123024002457-mainext.pdf8.59 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.