Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/109753
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorAkbariforouz, Men_US
dc.creatorZhao, Qen_US
dc.creatorStocchino, Aen_US
dc.creatorZheng, Cen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-14T06:24:55Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-14T06:24:55Z-
dc.identifier.issn1365-1609en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/109753-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectDeformation modulusen_US
dc.subjectElectrical resistivity tomographyen_US
dc.subjectNumerical back-analysisen_US
dc.subjectRepresentative elementary volumeen_US
dc.titleEvaluating the deformation modulus at representative elementary volume using electrical resistivity tomographyen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume183en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105935en_US
dcterms.abstractThe deformation modulus of rock mass is an essential parameter for evaluating the bearing capacity and deformations. A deformation modulus obtained through conventional approaches, including empirical equations and in situ tests, cannot present the deformation modulus at representative elementary volume (DREV) due to limited test coverage and technical difficulties in harsh geological or topographic conditions. This study utilized electrical resistivity (ER) tomography and numerical back-analysis to investigate DREV at the Asmari-Jahrum formation. We employed geoelectrical contrasts to detect proper locations for installing extensometers at excavated galleries. The deformations recorded by extensometer were used to back-calculate the DREV values by finite difference numerical modeling. We established a correlation between ER and DREV to predict DREV, which were 30–80 % more accurate than those obtained through conventional approaches at the study site. The tested area, anisotropy, creep, ER inaccuracies, and plastic deformations are evaluated as statistically significant factors that can influence DREV. Our methodology provides a systematical approach to assess DREV, which applies to geoengineering projects within the Asmari-Jahrum formation or similar sedimentary units (ER below 200 Ω⸱m). This methodology is also replicable for other geological formations with harsh geology or limited access without exposing an extreme financial burden or environmental issues.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences, Nov. 2024, v. 183, 105935en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of rock mechanics and mining sciencesen_US
dcterms.issued2024-11-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-4545en_US
dc.identifier.artn105935en_US
dc.description.validate202411 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3280-
dc.identifier.SubFormID49874-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2026-11-30en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2026-11-30
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

4
Citations as of Nov 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.