Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/109565
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: A model-based quantitative analysis of efficacy and associated factors of platelet rich plasma treatment for osteoarthritis
Authors: Cao, Y
Luo, J
Han, S
Li, Z
Fan, T
Zeng, M
Wen, X
Peng, Y
Jiang, L
Han, W
Lin, L
Fu, SN 
Hunter, DJ
Ding, C
Li, L
Zhu, Z
Issue Date: Jun-2023
Source: International journal of surgery, June 2023, v. 109, no. 6, p. 1742-1752
Abstract: Objective: While platelet rich plasma (PRP) has been extensively studied in treating osteoarthritis (OA), there has been an ongoing debate regarding the efficacy of PRP and the optimal subpopulation for PRP treatment remains unknown. The authors hereby aim to establish a pharmacodynamic model-based meta-analysis to quantitatively evaluate PRP efficacy, comparing with hyaluronic acid (HA) and identify relevant factors that significantly affect the efficacy of PRP treatment for OA.
Methods: The authors searched for PubMed and the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials of PRP randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the treatment of symptomatic or radiographic OA from the inception dates to 15 July 2022. Participants’ clinical and demographic characteristics and efficacy data, defined as Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and visual analog scale pain scores at each time point were extracted.
Results: A total of 45 RCTs (3829 participants) involving 1805 participants injected with PRP were included in the analysis. PRP reached a peak efficacy at ~ 2–3 months after injection in patients with OA. Both conventional meta-analysis and pharmacodynamic maximal effect models showed that PRP was significantly more effective than HA for joint pain and function impairment (additional decrease of 1.1, 0.5, 4.3, and 1.1 scores compared to HA treatment at 12 months for Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain, stiffness, function, and visual analog scale pain scores, respectively). Higher baseline symptom scores, older age (≥60 years), higher BMI (≥30), lower Kellgren–Lawrence grade (≤2) and shorter OA duration (<6 months) were significantly associated with greater efficacy of PRP treatment.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that PRP is a more effective treatment for OA than the more well-known HA treatment. The authors also determined the time when the PRP injection reaches peak efficacy and optimized the targeting subpopulation of OA. Further high-quality RCTs are required to confirm the optimal population of PRP in the treatment of OA.
Keywords: Model-based meta-analysis
Osteoarthritis
Platelet rich plasma
Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Health
Journal: International journal of surgery 
EISSN: 1743-9159
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000337
Rights: Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
The following publication Cao, Y., Luo, J., Han, S., Li, Z., Fan, T., Zeng, M., Wen, X., Peng, Y., Jiang, L., Han, W., Lin, L., Fu, S. N., Hunter, D. J., Ding, C., Li, L., & Zhu, Z. (2023). A model-based quantitative analysis of efficacy and associated factors of platelet rich plasma treatment for osteoarthritis. International Journal of Surgery, 109(6), 1742-1752 is available at https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000337.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cao_Model-based_Quantitative_Analysis.pdf860.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

9
Citations as of Nov 24, 2024

Downloads

10
Citations as of Nov 24, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
Citations as of Nov 21, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
Citations as of Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.