Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/109538
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of English and Communication-
dc.creatorRen, Sen_US
dc.creatorHu, Gen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-08T06:09:32Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-08T06:09:32Z-
dc.identifier.issn1139-7241en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/109538-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAsociacion Europea de Lenguas para Fines Especificosen_US
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2023 Songsha Ren, Guangwei Huen_US
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Ren, S., & Hu, G. (2023). Two Chinese medical doctors’ English scholarly publishing practices: Challenges, contradictions and coping strategies. Ibérica, (45), 289–315 is available at https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-2784.45.289.en_US
dc.subjectAcademic writingen_US
dc.subjectActivity theoryen_US
dc.subjectEnglish-as-anadditional-language researchersen_US
dc.subjectInternational publishingen_US
dc.subjectMedical doctorsen_US
dc.titleTwo Chinese medical doctors’ English scholarly publishing practices : challenges, contradictions and coping strategiesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage289en_US
dc.identifier.epage315en_US
dc.identifier.issue45en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.17398/2340-2784.45.289en_US
dcterms.abstractAgainst the backdrop of English being the academic lingua franca, Chinese medical doctors are under tremendous pressure to get their research published in English-medium journals. This paper reports on a multiple-case study of Chinese medical doctors’ scholarly publishing in English. Drawing on multiple types of data collected from two doctors at a major hospital affiliated with a top research-intensive university in mainland China, we explored the focal participants’ perspectives on their difficulties in scholarly publishing, their strategies for addressing these difficulties, and the factors and resources at work in their navigation of the publishing processes. Informed by Activity Theory, we identified contradictions within the doctors’ scholarly publishing activity systems. We focused on the rules and tools that framed the doctors’ scholarly publishing activities, and our findings revealed how they drew on an array of tools and signs to resolve the contradictions and meditate their scholarly publishing endeavors. Our study points to the need for institutional policies and initiatives to support Chinese medical doctors aspiring for international publication.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIberica, 7 June 2023, no. 45, p. 289-315en_US
dcterms.isPartOfIbericaen_US
dcterms.issued2023-06-07-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85162062225-
dc.identifier.eissn2340-2784en_US
dc.description.validate202411 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOS-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
695-Article Text-1998-1-10-20230610.pdf1.18 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

5
Citations as of Nov 24, 2024

Downloads

7
Citations as of Nov 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.