Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/109376
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estateen_US
dc.creatorYu, Qen_US
dc.creatorHui, ECMen_US
dc.creatorShen, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-07T06:43:51Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-07T06:43:51Z-
dc.identifier.issn1042-4431en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/109376-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.subjectCarbon neutrality commitmenten_US
dc.subjectCumulative abnormal returnen_US
dc.subjectEvent studyen_US
dc.subjectSocial responsibilityen_US
dc.subjectState ownershipen_US
dc.titleAre state-owned enterprises more responsible for carbon neutrality? Evidence from stock market reactions to China’s commitment to carbon neutralityen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationTitle on author's file: Does state ownership facilitate or impede corporate carbon neutrality? Evidence from stock market reactions to China’s commitment to carbon neutralityen_US
dc.identifier.volume96en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.intfin.2024.102055en_US
dcterms.abstractThis study investigates whether state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are more responsible for carbon neutrality in the context of a country that produces the most carbon dioxide. It examines listed firms’ market reactions to carbon neutrality commitment for China that was announced first time on 22 September 2020. Using the event study method and based on 2,792 listed firms, we find that overall market reactions to the carbon neutrality commitment is significantly negative, suggesting that firms are expected to exert genuine efforts towards attaining the national goal of carbon neutrality. Furthermore, our results indicate that SOEs encounter more substantial negative market reactions compared to non-SOEs, indicative of higher expectations placed on them for realizing the carbon neutrality commitment. Further analysis reveals that negative market reactions are particularly pronounced for central SOEs as opposed to local SOEs, as the former are perceived to bear a heavier responsibility in achieving national goals. Additionally, SOEs with higher corporate social responsibility scores experience stronger negative market reactions in comparison to those with lower scores. Further analysis based on a difference-in-differences method and a firm-year sample shows that SOEs reduce firm value and carbon emissions intensity more than non-SOEs after the carbon neutrality commitment. Overall, our study supports the argument that SOEs take more responsibility than non-SOEs in achieving carbon neutrality.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of international financial markets, institutions and money, Oct. 2024, v. 96, 102055en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of international financial markets, institutions and moneyen_US
dcterms.issued2024-10-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-0612en_US
dc.identifier.artn102055en_US
dc.description.validate202410 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3222-
dc.identifier.SubFormID49803-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe Hong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2026-10-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2026-10-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

25
Citations as of Nov 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.