Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/109242
Title: | Forensic linguistics : a scientometric review | Authors: | Alduais, A Al-Khulaidi, MA Allegretta, S Abdulkhalek, MM |
Issue Date: | 2023 | Source: | Cogent arts & humanities, 2023, v. 10, no. 1, 2214387 | Abstract: | Forensic linguistics is a distinct field of study in the science of language that places significant emphasis on the observation of language usage in our daily lives, including spoken and written language, listening, and reading. This focus on language usage provides a legal perspective for the analysis of language. Initially, forensic linguistics was confined to the identification of spoken and written documents in legal settings, police language, and prison language; however, the field has expanded to include speech detection, text detection, plagiarism detection, social media verbal violence detection, social security detection, and discrimination detection. In this study, we examined the development of forensic linguistics through the use of knowledge maps. We conducted a scientometric analysis of 6,490 triangulated documents from three major knowledge databases (Scopus, WOS, and Lens) that were published between 1936 and 2022. The development of forensic linguistics was measured using eight bibliometric indicators and eight scientometric indicators, and we used CiteSpace 5.8.R3 and VOSviewer 1.6.18 software packages to create knowledge maps and tabulations. Our major findings include the identification of commonly used keywords in forensic linguistics, such as human, linguistics, legal translation, language, speech recognition, legal language, authorship attribution, and natural language processing system. Additionally, the following terms were observed to be synonymous with forensic linguistics: linguistic law, language policy, language and law, official language, legal translation, linguistic rights, and legal linguistics. Our scientometric analysis allowed us to group the 6,460 documents in forensic linguistics into various clusters based on research patterns in the field, such as the role of forensic linguists in legal contexts, legal translation, legal composition, forensic voice comparison, authorship attribution, and human language technologies. Other clusters included the use of forensic linguistics in police interview settings, public service and courtroom settings, linguistic rights, as well as online debate. The study has implications for researchers, writers, public speakers, YouTubers, and all social media users, TV reporters, news reporters, and media professionals. In contemporary society, there is a rapid proliferation of ignorance concerning copyrights and the rights of others. Therefore, it is crucial to raise awareness among the general public about these rights. | Keywords: | Authorship analysis Courtroom language Courtroom translation Forensic linguistics Language and law Language detection Legal linguistics Plagiarism Scientometric review |
Publisher: | Cogent OA | Journal: | Cogent arts & humanities | EISSN: | 2331-1983 | DOI: | 10.1080/23311983.2023.2214387 | Rights: | © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent. The following publication Alduais, A., Al-Khulaidi, M. A., Allegretta, S., & Abdulkhalek, M. M. (2023). Forensic linguistics: A scientometric review. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1), 2214387 is available at https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2214387. |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alduais_Forensic_Linguistics_Scientometric.pdf | 8.82 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
12
Citations as of Nov 24, 2024
Downloads
7
Citations as of Nov 24, 2024
SCOPUSTM
Citations
3
Citations as of Nov 21, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.