Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/108975
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Biomedical Engineering-
dc.contributorResearch Institute for Smart Ageing-
dc.contributorUniversity Research Facility in Behavioral and Systems Neuroscience-
dc.contributorResearch Centre for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence-
dc.creatorLin, L-
dc.creatorQing, W-
dc.creatorHuang, Y-
dc.creatorYe, F-
dc.creatorRong, W-
dc.creatorLi, W-
dc.creatorJiao, J-
dc.creatorHu, X-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-11T08:34:36Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-11T08:34:36Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/108975-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.rights© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Lin, L.; Qing, W.; Huang, Y.; Ye, F.; Rong, W.; Li, W.; Jiao, J.; Hu, X. Comparison of Immediate Neuromodulatory Effects between Focal Vibratory and Electrical Sensory Stimulations after Stroke. Bioengineering 2024, 11, 286 is available at https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11030286.en_US
dc.subjectCortical responseen_US
dc.subjectElectroencephalography (EEG)en_US
dc.subjectFocal vibratory stimulation (FVS)en_US
dc.subjectNeuromodulationen_US
dc.subjectNeuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)en_US
dc.subjectSomatosensory impairmenten_US
dc.subjectStrokeen_US
dc.titleComparison of immediate neuromodulatory effects between focal vibratory and electrical sensory stimulations after strokeen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume11-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/bioengineering11030286-
dcterms.abstractFocal vibratory stimulation (FVS) and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) are promising technologies for sensory rehabilitation after stroke. However, the differences between these techniques in immediate neuromodulatory effects on the poststroke cortex are not yet fully understood. In this research, cortical responses in persons with chronic stroke (n = 15) and unimpaired controls (n = 15) were measured by whole-brain electroencephalography (EEG) when FVS and NMES at different intensities were applied transcutaneously to the forearm muscles. Both FVS and sensory-level NMES induced alpha and beta oscillations in the sensorimotor cortex after stroke, significantly exceeding baseline levels (p < 0.05). These oscillations exhibited bilateral sensory deficiency, early adaptation, and contralesional compensation compared to the control group. FVS resulted in a significantly faster P300 response (p < 0.05) and higher theta oscillation (p < 0.05) compared to NMES. The beta desynchronization over the contralesional frontal–parietal area remained during NMES (p > 0.05), but it was significantly weakened during FVS (p < 0.05) after stroke. The results indicated that both FVS and NMES effectively activated the sensorimotor cortex after stroke. However, FVS was particularly effective in eliciting transient involuntary attention, while NMES primarily fostered the cortical responses of the targeted muscles in the contralesional motor cortex.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBioengineering, Mar. 2024, v. 11, no. 3, 286-
dcterms.isPartOfBioengineering-
dcterms.issued2024-03-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85188685002-
dc.identifier.eissn2306-5354-
dc.identifier.artn286-
dc.description.validate202409_bcwh-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberCDCF_2023-2024en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextHong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.fundingTextInnovation and Technology Funden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
bioengineering-11-00286.pdf5.39 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

99
Citations as of Feb 9, 2026

Downloads

34
Citations as of Feb 9, 2026

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
Citations as of May 8, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.