Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/108661
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
dc.creatorChan, ZYS-
dc.creatorAngel, C-
dc.creatorThomson, D-
dc.creatorFerber, R-
dc.creatorTsang, SMH-
dc.creatorCheung, RTH-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-27T04:39:51Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-27T04:39:51Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/108661-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.rights© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Chan ZYS, Angel C, Thomson D, Ferber R, Tsang SMH, Cheung RTH. Evaluation of a Restoration Algorithm Applied to Clipped Tibial Acceleration Signals. Sensors. 2023; 23(10):4609 is available at https://doi.org/10.3390/s23104609.en_US
dc.subjectAccelerometeren_US
dc.subjectInterpolationen_US
dc.subjectOperating rangeen_US
dc.subjectPeak tibial accelerationen_US
dc.subjectWearable sensorsen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of a restoration algorithm applied to clipped tibial acceleration signalsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume23-
dc.identifier.issue10-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/s23104609-
dcterms.abstractWireless accelerometers with various operating ranges have been used to measure tibial acceleration. Accelerometers with a low operating range output distorted signals and have been found to result in inaccurate measurements of peaks. A restoration algorithm using spline interpolation has been proposed to restore the distorted signal. This algorithm has been validated for axial peaks within the range of 15.0–15.9 g. However, the accuracy of peaks of higher magnitude and the resultant peaks have not been reported. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the measurement agreement of the restored peaks using a low-range accelerometer (±16 g) against peaks sampled using a high-range accelerometer (±200 g). The measurement agreement of both the axial and resultant peaks were examined. In total, 24 runners were equipped with 2 tri-axial accelerometers at their tibia and completed an outdoor running assessment. The accelerometer with an operating range of ±200 g was used as reference. The results of this study showed an average difference of −1.40 ± 4.52 g and −1.23 ± 5.48 g for axial and resultant peaks. Based on our findings, the restoration algorithm could skew data and potentially lead to incorrect conclusions if used without caution.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSensors, May 2023, v. 23, no. 10, 4609-
dcterms.isPartOfSensors-
dcterms.issued2023-05-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85160666310-
dc.identifier.eissn1424-8220-
dc.identifier.artn4609-
dc.description.validate202408 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextNSERC CREATE Wearable Technology Research and Collaboration (We-TRAC) Training Program; Western Sydney University Summer Scholarshipen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
sensors-23-04609.pdf3.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

83
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025

Downloads

23
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.