Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/108575
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorWang, QC-
dc.creatorYu, SN-
dc.creatorChen, ZX-
dc.creatorWeng, YW-
dc.creatorXue, J-
dc.creatorLiu, X-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-19T01:59:11Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-19T01:59:11Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/108575-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Wang, Q.-C., Yu, S.-N., Chen, Z.-X., Weng, Y.-W., Xue, J., & Liu, X. (2023). Promoting additive construction in fast-developing areas: An analysis of policies and stakeholder perspectives. Developments in the Built Environment, 16, 100271 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100271.en_US
dc.subject3D printing constructionen_US
dc.subjectPolicy mixesen_US
dc.subjectQ methodologyen_US
dc.subjectStakeholderen_US
dc.subjectSustainable innovation transitionen_US
dc.titlePromoting additive construction in fast-developing areas : an analysis of policies and stakeholder perspectivesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume16-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100271-
dcterms.abstractConstruction 3D printing (C3DP) has emerged as an important force in automation and sustainable transformation of the construction industry. Despite the implementation of numerous incentive policies, its development and application remain at a relatively slow pace in developing countries. This research employs the Q methodology to explore the perspectives of China's stakeholders on the innovation policies for the development and application of C3DP. The study reviews the development of C3DP in China and identifies statements related to C3DP promotion policy and development. Based on data from C3DP industrial experts, the results reveal four distinct policy perspectives: conservative exploration, aggressive progression, intensive investigation, and tentative stimulation. A consensus exists that provides direction for policymaking though the divergences among stakeholders highlight the complexity of implementing policy mixes. This study has theoretical and practical significance in supporting policy mixes for C3DP development and adoption in fast-growing areas.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDevelopments in the built environment, Dec. 2023, v. 16, 100271-
dcterms.isPartOfDevelopments in the built environment-
dcterms.issued2023-12-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85179626933-
dc.identifier.eissn2666-1659-
dc.identifier.artn100271-
dc.description.validate202408 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextBright Building project; Cambridge Trust; Henry Lester Trust Granten_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S2666165923001539-main.pdf5.2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

39
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

20
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
Citations as of Sep 12, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.