Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/108507
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciences-
dc.creatorTam, KP-
dc.creatorChan, HW-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-19T01:58:49Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-19T01:58:49Z-
dc.identifier.issn0272-4944-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/108507-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAcademic Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Tam, K.-P., & Chan, H.-W. (2023). Conspiracy theories and climate change: A systematic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 91, 102129 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102129.en_US
dc.subjectAdaptationen_US
dc.subjectClimate changeen_US
dc.subjectClimate denialen_US
dc.subjectClimate skepticismen_US
dc.subjectConspiracy theoryen_US
dc.subjectGlobal warmingen_US
dc.subjectMitigationen_US
dc.subjectReviewen_US
dc.titleConspiracy theories and climate change : a systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume91-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102129-
dcterms.abstractResearch on conspiracy theories and climate change is emerging. Existing studies came from a range of scholarly disciplines, asked different research questions, and used various research methods. Given the heterogeneity in these studies, there is a pressing need to synthesize the current state of knowledge on the topic and identify the priority directions for further research. We address this need with a preregistered systematic review. Our review covered 43 studies from 38 articles. We organized our review of these studies by the following methodological categories: survey studies, experiments, interview studies, media studies, ethnographic studies, and mathematically modelling. For each category, we offered a summary of evidence, highlighted the key insights, and identify knowledge gaps. We concluded with a proposed integrative framework for research on the topic. As conspiracy theories can be an obstacle to climate change mitigation and adaptation, the present review would provide invaluable insights for not only scientists but also climate-related practitioners (e.g., environmental organizations, educators) and decision makers (e.g., policymakers) to consider.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of environmental psychology, Nov. 2023, 91, 102129-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of environmental psychology-
dcterms.issued2023-11-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85171178570-
dc.identifier.eissn1522-9610-
dc.identifier.artn102129-
dc.description.validate202408 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0272494423001779-main.pdf4.15 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

107
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025

Downloads

55
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

25
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

20
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.