Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/108411
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorSeo, BKen_US
dc.creatorKim, Den_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-16T08:43:20Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-16T08:43:20Z-
dc.identifier.issn0309-1317en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/108411-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.en_US
dc.titleThe housing-welfare regime and third-sector housing in Hong Kong and South Korea : a historical institutionalist perspectiveen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationTitle on author's file: The housing-welfare regime and third sector housing in Hong Kong and South Korea : A historical institutionalist perspectiveen_US
dc.identifier.spage442en_US
dc.identifier.epage462en_US
dc.identifier.volume48en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1468-2427.13231en_US
dcterms.abstractThe third sector has recently emerged, or re-emerged, as a new housing provider for disadvantaged groups in Hong Kong and Korea, where affordable housing development has been predominantly directed by government. However, our knowledge of third-sector housing in non-Western contexts remains partial. In this article, we aim to provide, from a historical-institutionalist perspective, a comparative account of the (re-)emergence and implementation of third-sector affordable housing delivery in Hong Kong and Korea. Based on the housing-welfare regime framework, we discuss the socioeconomic and political contexts in which third-sector housing has burgeoned in the two regions, and how the relationship between the government and the third sector has moulded the implementation of third-sector housing. We highlight the significant power of the government in implementing third-sector housing and third-sector organizations’ continued complementary role to the government in supplying housing as welfare, which reflects the path-dependent nature of housing and welfare policies in the two regions. Adopting a long view to understanding history and a broader framework that reflects the socioeconomic context contributes to advancing the comparative housing literature.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of urban and regional research, May 2024, v. 48, no. 3, p. 442-462en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of urban and regional researchen_US
dcterms.issued2024-05-
dc.identifier.eissn1468-2427en_US
dc.description.validate202408 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2576-
dc.identifier.SubFormID47898-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe Hong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2026-05-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2026-05-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

73
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.