Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/108335
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorWang, Fen_US
dc.creatorZhang, TTen_US
dc.creatorYou, Ren_US
dc.creatorChen, Qen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-08T01:53:43Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-08T01:53:43Z-
dc.identifier.issn0360-1323en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/108335-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.rights© 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.rights© 2023. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Wang, F., Zhang, T., You, R., & Chen, Q. (2023). Evaluation of infection probability of Covid-19 in different types of airliner cabins. Building and Environment, 234, 110159 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110159.en_US
dc.subjectAir distributionen_US
dc.subjectComputational fluid dynamics (CFD)en_US
dc.subjectEconomy-class cabinen_US
dc.subjectExperimental validationen_US
dc.subjectInfectious diseaseen_US
dc.subjectWells-Riley modelen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of infection probability of Covid-19 in different types of airliner cabinsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume234en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110159en_US
dcterms.abstractAccording to the World Health Organization (https://covid19.who.int/), more than 651 million people have been infected by COVID-19, and more than 6.6 million of them have died. COVID-19 has spread to almost every country in the world because of air travel. Cases of COVID-19 transmission from an index patient to fellow passengers in commercial airplanes have been widely reported. This investigation used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to simulate airflow and COVID-19 virus (SARS-CoV-2) transport in a variety of airliner cabins. The cabins studied were economy-class with 2-2, 3-3, 2-3-2, and 3-3-3 seat configurations, respectively. The CFD results were validated by using experimental data from a seven-row cabin mockup with a 3-3 seat configuration. This study used the Wells-Riley model to estimate the probability of infection with SARS-CoV-2. The results show that CFD can predict airflow and virus transmission with acceptable accuracy. With an assumed flight time of 4 h, the infection probability was almost the same among the different cabins, except that the 3-3-3 configuration had a lower risk because of its airflow pattern. Flying time was the most important parameter for causing the infection, while cabin type also played a role. Without mask wearing by the passengers and the index patient, the infection probability could be 8% for a 10-h, long-haul flight, such as a twin-aisle air cabin with 3-3-3 seat configuration.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBuilding and environment, 15 Apr. 2023, v. 234, 110159en_US
dcterms.isPartOfBuilding and environmenten_US
dcterms.issued2023-04-15-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-684Xen_US
dc.identifier.artn110159en_US
dc.description.validate202408 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3122-
dc.identifier.SubFormID49661-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wang_Evaluation_Infection_Probability.pdfPre-Published version3.7 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

43
Citations as of Apr 13, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

21
Citations as of Apr 24, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.