Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/108325
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Chinese and Bilingual Studies | en_US |
dc.creator | Fei, W | en_US |
dc.creator | Hsu, YY | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-06T04:41:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-06T04:41:31Z | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/108325 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.rights | The following publication Fei, W., Hsu, Y.-Y. (2024) Investigating Mandarin Tone and Focus Prosody Production in Hong Kong Cantonese Speakers. Proc. Speech Prosody 2024, 378-382, doi: 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2024-77 is available at https://www.isca-archive.org/speechprosody_2024/fei24_speechprosody.html. | en_US |
dc.subject | Speech production | en_US |
dc.subject | Focus prosody | en_US |
dc.subject | L2 production | en_US |
dc.subject | Acoustic analysis | en_US |
dc.title | Investigating Mandarin tone and focus prosody production in Hong Kong Cantonese speakers | en_US |
dc.type | Conference Paper | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | Second-language (L2) acquisition is influenced by the differences and similarities between a learner’s first language (L1) and their target language. Because prior research has shown that Cantonese and Mandarin speakers employ different acoustic strategies to express focus in speech, this study examines how Hong Kong Cantonese (HKC) speakers, who are L2 Mandarin speakers, produce Mandarin focus prosody. Twenty HKC speakers completed a tone identification-production task with 72 monosyllabic Mandarin words used in the main experiment. Based on how well they performed this task, they were divided into two proficiency groups. The members of both groups then performed a speech-production task in which they answered pre-recorded wh-questions, focusing on either a numeral (ANUM), or a noun phrase (ANP). The results showed that the sampled HKC speakers did not use the typically observed HKC focus-marking strategy when producing Mandarin focus, but instead adopted a new acoustic strategy consisting of partial Cantonese focus marking strategy (lengthening) and some post-focus F0 compression, when speakers have a higher level of Mandarin proficiency. The two proficiency groups' acoustic approaches to expressing Mandarin focus differed from each other. These results represent an important contribution to our understanding of how HKC speakers perceive and produce Mandarin tone and prosody, and shed new light on L2 speech acquisition at both the suprasegmental and the sentential levels. | en_US |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Presented in Speech Prosody 2024, 2-5 July 2024, Leiden, The Netherlands | en_US |
dcterms.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.description.validate | 202408 bcwh | en_US |
dc.description.oa | Version of Record | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | a3000 | - |
dc.identifier.SubFormID | 49137 | - |
dc.description.fundingSource | Self-funded | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
dc.description.oaCategory | Publisher permission | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Conference Paper |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
fei24_speechprosody.pdf | 1.72 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
122
Citations as of Apr 13, 2025
Downloads
54
Citations as of Apr 13, 2025

Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.