Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/108302
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Computingen_US
dc.creatorCamus, RMen_US
dc.creatorNgai, Gen_US
dc.creatorKwan, KPen_US
dc.creatorLau, KHen_US
dc.creatorChan, Sen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-01T03:07:39Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-01T03:07:39Z-
dc.identifier.issn1462-3943en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/108302-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.rights© 2023 The Hong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Reflective Practice on 01 Oct 2023 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14623943.2023.2264204.en_US
dc.subjectApplied sciences & engineeringen_US
dc.subjectBusiness & humanitiesen_US
dc.subjectDisciplinary differencesen_US
dc.subjectHealth & social careen_US
dc.subjectReflectionen_US
dc.subjectService-learningen_US
dc.titleTeaching reflection in service-learning : disciplinary differences in conception and practiceen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage766en_US
dc.identifier.epage783en_US
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14623943.2023.2264204en_US
dcterms.abstractFaculty from diverse disciplines are involved in teaching service-learning where reflection is an essential component. This qualitative study explores disciplinary differences in understanding reflection and use of reflective pedagogy. We interviewed faculty (N = 24) from 18 departments to examine differences in how they conceive and practice reflective pedagogy in service-learning courses. We found that disciplinary differences are a factor in how faculty conceive and practice reflection. Faculty from health and social care disciplines demonstrated an advantage compared to colleagues from other fields. Further, we found that how faculty conceive reflection is a factor in reflective practice. Conceptualizations of reflection, which are more student-referent or learner-focused, correlate with the more intense and effective practice of reflective pedagogy.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationReflective practice, 2023, v. 24, no. 6, p. 766-783en_US
dcterms.isPartOfReflective practiceen_US
dcterms.issued2023-
dc.identifier.eissn1470-1103en_US
dc.description.validate202408 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3114-
dc.identifier.SubFormID49646-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextHong Kong University Grants Committeeen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Camus_Teaching_Reflection_Service-learning.pdfPre-Published version1.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

89
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

23
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.