Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/108076
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of English and Communication-
dc.creatorChen, Y-
dc.creatorGao, J-
dc.creatorHirzingerUnterrainer, EM-
dc.creatorHui, B-
dc.creatorKremmel, B-
dc.creatorLi, P-
dc.creatorMa, S-
dc.creatorMaie, R-
dc.creatorPuimège, E-
dc.creatorRogers, J-
dc.creatorWilson, M-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-23T04:08:20Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-23T04:08:20Z-
dc.identifier.issn0272-2631-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/108076-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s), 2024.Published by Cambridge University Press.This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/ 4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is used to distribute the re-used or adapted article and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication First language effects on incidental vocabulary learning through bimodal input: A multisite, preregistered, and close replication of Malone (). Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Published online 2024:1-26 is available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263124000275.en_US
dc.titleFirst language effects on incidental vocabulary learning through bimodal inputen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0272263124000275-
dcterms.abstractDespite accumulating evidence, accounts for the efficacy of reading-while-listening (RWL) in facilitating vocabulary learning are largely unexamined, hindering a thorough understanding of the reasons underlying the usefulness of such bimodal input. In this article, we report a close replication of Malone (2018), purposefully manipulating the participants’ native language background to shed light on whether the auditory component in RWL promotes spoken-written form mappings. One hundred and eighty-eight English learners from Austria, Belgium, Hong Kong, and Beijing read or read and listened to four stories containing target words for learning. They completed two surprise vocabulary tests and two assessments of working memory capacity. We only replicated a correlation between working memory capacity and the form recognition test reported in the initial study. Thanks to our manipulation, we discovered an important role of L1 background in the effectiveness of RWL for form recognition knowledge. We discuss the implications for RWL research.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationStudies in second language acquisition, Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 June 2024, FirstView, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263124000275-
dcterms.isPartOfStudies in second language acquisition-
dcterms.issued2024-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85197258037-
dc.identifier.eissn1470-1545-
dc.description.validate202407 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3074en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID49383en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chen_First_Language_Effects.pdf1.97 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

36
Citations as of Dec 22, 2024

Downloads

12
Citations as of Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.