Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/107857
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorGuo, Ren_US
dc.creatorLiu, Yen_US
dc.creatorLu, HJen_US
dc.creatorJing, Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-15T07:54:53Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-15T07:54:53Z-
dc.identifier.issn0340-0727en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/107857-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer,en_US
dc.rights© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023en_US
dc.rightsThis version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use (https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/accepted-manuscript-terms), but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01875-z.en_US
dc.titleCan you accurately monitor your behaviors while multitasking? The effect of multitasking on metacognitionen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage580en_US
dc.identifier.epage593en_US
dc.identifier.volume88en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00426-023-01875-zen_US
dcterms.abstractWith the pace of life accelerating, multitasking has become the norm in daily life. According to research, multiple cognitive processes, including numerical reasoning, comprehension, and writing, are negatively affected by multitasking. However, only a few studies have investigated the relationship between multitasking and metacognition. In this study, the effect of multitasking on metacognition was examined using a prospective monitoring paradigm (prediction of subsequent recall performance). In Experiment 1, the participants simultaneously studied word pairs (primary task) and differentiated between different sound pitches (secondary task) and then predicted their performance in a subsequent memory test for the studied word pairs (prospective metacognitive monitoring). The accuracy of metacognitive evaluation with multitasking was then compared with that without multitasking. In Experiment 2, sounds and icons of real-life applications were used to improve the ecological validity of the experiment in the secondary task. The results indicated that multitasking impaired metacognition in both artificial and real-life simulated scenarios. In addition, the participants who engaged in more media multitasking in their daily lives exhibited poorer metacognitive monitoring abilities in single tasks.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPsychological research, Mar. 2024, v. 88, no. 2, p. 580-593en_US
dcterms.isPartOfPsychological researchen_US
dcterms.issued2024-03-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85171266927-
dc.identifier.eissn1430-2772en_US
dc.description.validate202407 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3012-
dc.identifier.SubFormID49175-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextResearch grants from Social Science Foundation of Liaoning Province of Chinaen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Guo_Accurately_Monitor_Behaviors.pdfPre-Published version1.25 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

58
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

1
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
Citations as of Apr 3, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.