Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/107828
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studies-
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering-
dc.contributorResearch Institute for Advanced Manufacturing-
dc.creatorZhang, M-
dc.creatorShen, Q-
dc.creatorZhao, Z-
dc.creatorWang, S-
dc.creatorHuang, GQ-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-12T06:07:05Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-12T06:07:05Z-
dc.identifier.issn0360-8352-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/107828-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectConstruction supply chainen_US
dc.subjectEvolutionary gameen_US
dc.subjectLogisticsen_US
dc.subjectRisk-averse behavioren_US
dc.subjectSpatial-temporal traceabilityen_US
dc.titleRisk-averse behavior and incentive policies : a new perspective on spatial–temporal traceability supervision in construction logistics supply chainsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume192-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cie.2024.110256-
dcterms.abstractSpatial-temporal decision support systems (STDSS) serve as a crucial strategy for enhancing operational governance and mitigating risk within construction logistics. However, construction supply chains involve many opaque stakeholders, hindering whole industry compliance monitoring. This research formulates a tripartite evolutionary game model that scrutinizes the strategic interactions among government regulators, carriers, and contractors, thereby offering insights into the collaborative supervision outcomes shaped by these stakeholder engagements. Government regulators choose intelligent supervision incentives versus regular oversight. Carriers decide whether to invest in STDSS or not. Contractors cooperate by enrolling or declining STDSS. As key STDSS investors, carriers’ decisions are investigated under varying risk preferences in an extension model. This examines how government incentives influence long-term intelligent supervision and risk aversion behavior emergence to improve safety and quality across construction supply chains. Our findings indicate that increased adverse events motivate government regulators to adopt STDSS incentives for oversight, though carriers and contractors are not necessarily prompted to implement STDSS themselves. Escalating risk aversion reduces carrier STDSS adoption likelihood as they maintain basic services. Carriers perceiving contractor free riding as unfair competition also demotivates STDSS rollout. Although larger subsidies initially raise STDSS implementation probability, carriers become unwilling to adopt STDSS over time even with greater subsidies. In summary, adverse events drive regulator but not necessarily carrier and contractor STDSS adoption, while risk aversion, perceived fairness and changing subsidy effectiveness over time shape carrier decisions.-
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationComputers and industrial engineering, June 2024, v. 192, 110256-
dcterms.isPartOfComputers and industrial engineering-
dcterms.issued2024-06-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-0550-
dc.identifier.artn110256-
dc.description.validate202407 bcch-
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2987cen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID49080en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-06-30en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-06-30
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

99
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.