Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/107578
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studiesen_US
dc.creatorWong, WWSen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-04T01:55:56Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-04T01:55:56Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/107578-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.rights© 2024 Winsy Wing Sze Wong. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Wong WWS (2024) Validation of a Cantonese Version of the Amsterdam-Nijmegen Everyday Language Test (CANELT): A functional approach. PLoS ONE 19(5): e0303810 is available at https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303810.en_US
dc.titleValidation of a Cantonese Version of the Amsterdam-Nijmegen Everyday Language Test (CANELT) : a functional approachen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume19en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0303810en_US
dcterms.abstractBackground: The current study aimed to validate the Cantonese version of the Amsterdam-Nijmegen Everyday Language Test (CANELT), a functional communication assessment tool for Cantonese speakers with aphasia. A quantitative scoring method was adopted to examine the pragmatics and informativeness of the production of people with aphasia (PWA).en_US
dcterms.abstractMethod: CANELT was translated from its English version with cultural adaptations. The performance on the 20-item CANELT collected from 56 PWA and 100 neurologically healthy Cantonesespeaking controls aged 30 to 79 years was orthographically transcribed. Scoring was based on the completeness of the main concepts produced in the preamble and subsequent elaborations, defined as Opening (O) and New Information (NI). Measures examining the validity and reliability were conducted.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: An age effect was found in neurologically healthy controls, and therefore z scores were used for subsequent comparisons between neurologically healthy controls and PWA. The test showed strong evidence for known-group validity in both O [χ2 (2) = 95.2, p < .001] and NI [χ2 (2) = 100.4, p < .001]. A moderate to strong correlation was found between CANELT and standardized aphasia assessment tools, suggesting satisfactory concurrent validity. Reliability measures were excellent in terms of internal consistency (Cronbach's a of .95 for both 'O' and 'NI'), test-retest reliability (ICC = .96; p < .001), intra-rater reliability (ICC = 1.00; p < .001), and inter-rater reliability for O (ICC = .99; p < .001) and NI (ICC = .99; p < .001). Sensitivity and specificity for O are 97% and 76.8%, respectively, while for NI, a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 91.1% were obtained.en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusions: Measures on validity and reliability yielded promising results, suggesting CANELT as a useful and reliable functional communication assessment for PWA. Its application in managing PWA and potential areas for development are discussed.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPLoS one, 24 May 2024, v. 19, no. 5, e0303810en_US
dcterms.isPartOfPLoS oneen_US
dcterms.issued2024-05-24-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85194196507-
dc.identifier.pmid38787889-
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203en_US
dc.identifier.artne0303810en_US
dc.description.validate202407_adaen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2939-
dc.identifier.SubFormID48857-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
dc.relation.rdatahttps://osf.io/xpmf9en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
journal.pone.0303810.pdf529.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

72
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025

Downloads

22
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.