Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/107556
| Title: | Improving radiomic model reliability using robust features from perturbations for head-and-neck carcinoma | Authors: | Teng, X Zhang, J Ma, Z Zhang, Y Lam, S Li, W Xiao, H Li, T Li, B Zhou, T Ren, G Lee, FKH Au, KH Lee, VHF Chang, ATY Cai, J |
Issue Date: | 2022 | Source: | Frontiers in oncology, 2022, v. 12, 974467 | Abstract: | Background: Using high robust radiomic features in modeling is recommended, yet its impact on radiomic model is unclear. This study evaluated the radiomic model’s robustness and generalizability after screening out low-robust features before radiomic modeling. The results were validated with four datasets and two clinically relevant tasks. Materials and methods: A total of 1,419 head-and-neck cancer patients’ computed tomography images, gross tumor volume segmentation, and clinically relevant outcomes (distant metastasis and local-regional recurrence) were collected from four publicly available datasets. The perturbation method was implemented to simulate images, and the radiomic feature robustness was quantified using intra-class correlation of coefficient (ICC). Three radiomic models were built using all features (ICC > 0), good-robust features (ICC > 0.75), and excellent-robust features (ICC > 0.95), respectively. A filter-based feature selection and Ridge classification method were used to construct the radiomic models. Model performance was assessed with both robustness and generalizability. The robustness of the model was evaluated by the ICC, and the generalizability of the model was quantified by the train-test difference of Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC). Results: The average model robustness ICC improved significantly from 0.65 to 0.78 (P< 0.0001) using good-robust features and to 0.91 (P< 0.0001) using excellent-robust features. Model generalizability also showed a substantial increase, as a closer gap between training and testing AUC was observed where the mean train-test AUC difference was reduced from 0.21 to 0.18 (P< 0.001) in good-robust features and to 0.12 (P< 0.0001) in excellent-robust features. Furthermore, good-robust features yielded the best average AUC in the unseen datasets of 0.58 (P< 0.001) over four datasets and clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Including robust only features in radiomic modeling significantly improves model robustness and generalizability in unseen datasets. Yet, the robustness of radiomic model has to be verified despite building with robust radiomic features, and tightly restricted feature robustness may prevent the optimal model performance in the unseen dataset as it may lower the discrimination power of the model. |
Keywords: | Feature reliability Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Model reliability Model robustness Radiomics |
Publisher: | Frontiers Research Foundation | Journal: | Frontiers in oncology | EISSN: | 2234-943X | DOI: | 10.3389/fonc.2022.974467 | Rights: | © 2022 Teng, Zhang, Ma, Zhang, Lam, Li, Xiao, Li, Li, Zhou, Ren, Lee, Au, Lee, Chang and Cai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. The following publication Teng X, Zhang J, Ma Z, Zhang Y, Lam S, Li W, Xiao H, Li T, Li B, Zhou T, Ren G, Lee FKH, Au KH, Lee VHF, Chang ATY and Cai J (2022) Improving radiomic model reliability using robust features from perturbations for head-and-neck carcinoma. Front. Oncol. 12:974467 is available at https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.974467. |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| fonc-12-974467.pdf | 7.27 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
120
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025
Downloads
51
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
24
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



