Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/107531
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering-
dc.creatorWen, X-
dc.creatorLiu, L-
dc.creatorChung, SH-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-02T06:24:32Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-02T06:24:32Z-
dc.identifier.issn2213-1388-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/107531-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.subjectAirport operationsen_US
dc.subjectAutonomous vehiclesen_US
dc.subjectAviationen_US
dc.subjectDecision supporten_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of autonomous vehicle applications in smart airports using Dombi Bonferroni mean operator based CIVL-BWM-TODIM decision making methodologyen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationTitle on author's file: Evaluation of Autonomous Vehicle Applications in Smart Airports using Dombi Bonferroni Operator based CIVL-BWM-TODIM Decision Making Methodologyen_US
dc.identifier.volume60-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.seta.2023.103523-
dcterms.abstractRecent advancements on autonomous vehicles (AVs) have revolutionized the aviation industry, providing great potential to enhance sustainability for this fuel-intensive industry. Diverse operation types of AVs at airports have emerged (e.g., for baggage/passenger movement). This study aims to provide a guideline on how to switch from the traditional human-driving vehicle operations to AV operations, to help improve the smartness and sustainability of airport operations. Five alternative operation types are evaluated under ten criteria. We propose a new CIVL-BWM-TODIM with Dombi Bonferroni mean operator (DBM) decision framework. The combination of the Continuous Interval-Valued Linguistic tool (CIVL) and the Best Worst Method (BWM) improves the criterial evaluation consistency, and the integration of CIVL and TODIM increases the evaluation accuracy on human language and psychological feelings. Besides, the DBM operator helps effectively integrate information from different experts. Results suggest that applying AVs for both functional activities and scheduled people delivery is the best alternative to build smart and sustainable airports. Sensitivity analyses are conducted to examine the impacts of various parameters on decision making. Moreover, comparative analysis over existing decision-making methods are carried out to validate the merits of the proposed approach.-
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSustainable energy technologies and assessments, Dec. 2023, v. 60, 103523-
dcterms.isPartOfSustainable energy technologies and assessments-
dcterms.issued2023-12-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85177988070-
dc.identifier.eissn2213-1396-
dc.identifier.artn103523-
dc.description.validate202407 bcch-
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2919aen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID48760en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2025-12-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2025-12-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

79
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.