Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/107450
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Optometryen_US
dc.creatorYuan, Yen_US
dc.creatorXiong, Ren_US
dc.creatorWang, Wen_US
dc.creatorXu, BYen_US
dc.creatorLiao, Cen_US
dc.creatorYang, Sen_US
dc.creatorLi, Cen_US
dc.creatorZhang, Jen_US
dc.creatorYin, Qen_US
dc.creatorZheng, Yen_US
dc.creatorFriedman, DSen_US
dc.creatorFoster, PJen_US
dc.creatorHe, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-24T07:02:48Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-24T07:02:48Z-
dc.identifier.issn2168-6165en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/107450-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Medical Associationen_US
dc.rights© 2024 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Yuan Y, Xiong R, Wang W, et al. Long-Term Risk and Prediction of Progression in Primary Angle Closure Suspect. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024;142(3):216–223 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.5286.en_US
dc.titleLong-term risk and prediction of progression in primary angle closure suspecten_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage216en_US
dc.identifier.epage223en_US
dc.identifier.volume142en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.5286en_US
dcterms.abstractImportance: Identifying primary angle closure suspect (PACS) eyes at risk of angle closure is crucial for its management. However, the risk of progression and its prediction are still understudied in long-term longitudinal studies about PACS.en_US
dcterms.abstractObjective: To explore baseline predictors and develop prediction models for the 14-year risk of progression from PACS to primary angle closure (PAC).en_US
dcterms.abstractDesign, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study involved participants from the Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention trial who had untreated eyes with PACS. Baseline examinations included tonometry, ultrasound A-scan biometry, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) under both light and dark conditions. Primary angle closure was defined as peripheral anterior synechiae in 1 or more clock hours, intraocular pressure (IOP) greater than 24 mm Hg, or acute angle closure. Based on baseline covariates, logistic regression models were built to predict the risk of progression from PACS to PAC during 14 years of follow-up.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: The analysis included 377 eyes from 377 patients (mean [SD] patient age at baseline, 58.28 [4.71] years; 317 females [84%]). By the 14-year follow-up visit, 93 eyes (25%) had progressed from PACS to PAC. In multivariable models, higher IOP (odds ratio [OR], 1.14 [95% CI, 1.04-1.25] per 1-mm Hg increase), shallower central anterior chamber depth (ACD; OR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.67-0.97] per 0.1-mm increase), and shallower limbal ACD (OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.99] per 0.01 increase in peripheral corneal thickness) at baseline were associated with an increased 14-year risk of progression from PACS to PAC. As for AS-OCT measurements, smaller light-room trabecular-iris space area (TISA) at 500 μm from the scleral spur (OR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.77-0.96] per 0.01-mm2 increase), smaller light-room angle recess area (ARA) at 750 μm from the scleral spur (OR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.98] per 0.01-mm2 increase), and smaller dark-room TISA at 500 μm (OR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.80-0.98] per 0.01-mm2 increase) at baseline were identified as predictors for the 14-year risk of progression. The prediction models based on IOP and central and limbal ACDs showed moderate performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.63-0.75) in predicting progression from PACS to PAC, and inclusion of AS-OCT metrics did not improve the model’s performance.en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusions and Relevance: This cohort study suggests that higher IOP, shallower central and limbal ACDs, and smaller TISA at 500 μm and light-room ARA at 750 μm may serve as baseline predictors for progression to PAC in PACS eyes. Evaluating these factors can aid in customizing PACS management.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJAMA ophthalmology, Mar. 2024, v. 142, no. 3, p. 216-223en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJAMA ophthalmologyen_US
dcterms.issued2024-03-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85182896441-
dc.identifier.eissn2168-6173en_US
dc.description.validate202406 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2869b-
dc.identifier.SubFormID48599-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextNatural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province; Hainan Province Clinical Medical Center; Global STEM Professorship Schemeen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Yuan_Long-term_Risk_Prediction.pdfPre-Published version1.67 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

3
Citations as of Jun 30, 2024

Downloads

2
Citations as of Jun 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.