Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/107446
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Optometry-
dc.contributorResearch Centre for SHARP Vision-
dc.creatorHu, Wen_US
dc.creatorJoseph, Sen_US
dc.creatorLi, Ren_US
dc.creatorWoods, Een_US
dc.creatorSun, Jen_US
dc.creatorShen, Men_US
dc.creatorJan, CLen_US
dc.creatorZhu, Zen_US
dc.creatorHe, Men_US
dc.creatorZhang, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-24T07:02:47Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-24T07:02:47Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/107446-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe Lancet Publishing Groupen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Hu, W., Joseph, S., Li, R., Woods, E., Sun, J., Shen, M., Jan, C. L., Zhu, Z., He, M., & Zhang, L. (2024). Population impact and cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence-based diabetic retinopathy screening in people living with diabetes in Australia: a cost effectiveness analysis. eClinicalMedicine, 67, 102387 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102387.en_US
dc.subjectArtificial intelligenceen_US
dc.subjectCost-effectivenessen_US
dc.subjectDiabetic retinopathyen_US
dc.subjectScreeningen_US
dc.titlePopulation impact and cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence-based diabetic retinopathy screening in people living with diabetes in Australia : a cost effectiveness analysisen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume67en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102387en_US
dcterms.abstractBackground: We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an artificial intelligence-(AI) based diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening system in the primary care setting for both non-Indigenous and Indigenous people living with diabetes in Australia.-
dcterms.abstractMethods: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis between January 01, 2022 and August 01, 2023. A decision-analytic Markov model was constructed to simulate DR progression in a population of 1,197,818 non-Indigenous and 65,160 Indigenous Australians living with diabetes aged ≥20 years over 40 years. From a healthcare provider's perspective, we compared current practice to three primary care AI-based screening scenarios—(A) substitution of current manual grading, (B) scaling up to patient acceptance level, and (C) achieving universal screening. Study results were presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), benefit-cost ratio (BCR), and net monetary benefits (NMB). A Willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of AU$50,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and a discount rate of 3.5% were adopted in this study.-
dcterms.abstractFindings: With the status quo, the non-Indigenous diabetic population was projected to develop 96,269 blindness cases, resulting in AU$13,039.6 m spending on DR screening and treatment during 2020–2060. In comparison, all three intervention scenarios were effective and cost-saving. In particular, if a universal screening program was to be implemented (Scenario C), it would prevent 38,347 blindness cases, gain 172,090 QALYs and save AU$595.8 m, leading to a BCR of 3.96 and NMB of AU$9,200 m. Similar findings were also reported in the Indigenous population. With the status quo, 3,396 Indigenous individuals would develop blindness, which would cost the health system AU$796.0 m during 2020–2060. All three intervention scenarios were cost-saving for the Indigenous population. Notably, universal AI-based DR screening (Scenario C) would prevent 1,211 blindness cases and gain 9,800 QALYs in the Indigenous population, leading to a saving of AU$19.2 m with a BCR of 1.62 and NMB of AU$509m.-
dcterms.abstractInterpretation: Our findings suggest that implementing AI-based DR screening in primary care is highly effective and cost-saving in both Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEClinicalMedicine, Jan. 2024, v. 67, 102387en_US
dcterms.isPartOfEClinicalMedicineen_US
dcterms.issued2024-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85181824454-
dc.identifier.eissn2589-5370en_US
dc.identifier.artn102387en_US
dc.description.validate202406 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2869-
dc.identifier.SubFormID48600-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextAustralian Government: the National Critical Research Infrastructure Initiative; Medical Research Future Fund; NHMRC Investigator Granten_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S2589537023005643-main.pdf2.36 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

131
Last Week
3
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

25
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

26
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

23
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.