Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/107446
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Optometry-
dc.contributorResearch Centre for SHARP Vision-
dc.creatorHu, Wen_US
dc.creatorJoseph, Sen_US
dc.creatorLi, Ren_US
dc.creatorWoods, Een_US
dc.creatorSun, Jen_US
dc.creatorShen, Men_US
dc.creatorJan, CLen_US
dc.creatorZhu, Zen_US
dc.creatorHe, Men_US
dc.creatorZhang, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-24T07:02:47Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-24T07:02:47Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/107446-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe Lancet Publishing Groupen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Hu, W., Joseph, S., Li, R., Woods, E., Sun, J., Shen, M., Jan, C. L., Zhu, Z., He, M., & Zhang, L. (2024). Population impact and cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence-based diabetic retinopathy screening in people living with diabetes in Australia: a cost effectiveness analysis. eClinicalMedicine, 67, 102387 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102387.en_US
dc.subjectArtificial intelligenceen_US
dc.subjectCost-effectivenessen_US
dc.subjectDiabetic retinopathyen_US
dc.subjectScreeningen_US
dc.titlePopulation impact and cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence-based diabetic retinopathy screening in people living with diabetes in Australia : a cost effectiveness analysisen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume67en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102387en_US
dcterms.abstractBackground: We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an artificial intelligence-(AI) based diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening system in the primary care setting for both non-Indigenous and Indigenous people living with diabetes in Australia.-
dcterms.abstractMethods: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis between January 01, 2022 and August 01, 2023. A decision-analytic Markov model was constructed to simulate DR progression in a population of 1,197,818 non-Indigenous and 65,160 Indigenous Australians living with diabetes aged ≥20 years over 40 years. From a healthcare provider's perspective, we compared current practice to three primary care AI-based screening scenarios—(A) substitution of current manual grading, (B) scaling up to patient acceptance level, and (C) achieving universal screening. Study results were presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), benefit-cost ratio (BCR), and net monetary benefits (NMB). A Willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of AU$50,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and a discount rate of 3.5% were adopted in this study.-
dcterms.abstractFindings: With the status quo, the non-Indigenous diabetic population was projected to develop 96,269 blindness cases, resulting in AU$13,039.6 m spending on DR screening and treatment during 2020–2060. In comparison, all three intervention scenarios were effective and cost-saving. In particular, if a universal screening program was to be implemented (Scenario C), it would prevent 38,347 blindness cases, gain 172,090 QALYs and save AU$595.8 m, leading to a BCR of 3.96 and NMB of AU$9,200 m. Similar findings were also reported in the Indigenous population. With the status quo, 3,396 Indigenous individuals would develop blindness, which would cost the health system AU$796.0 m during 2020–2060. All three intervention scenarios were cost-saving for the Indigenous population. Notably, universal AI-based DR screening (Scenario C) would prevent 1,211 blindness cases and gain 9,800 QALYs in the Indigenous population, leading to a saving of AU$19.2 m with a BCR of 1.62 and NMB of AU$509m.-
dcterms.abstractInterpretation: Our findings suggest that implementing AI-based DR screening in primary care is highly effective and cost-saving in both Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEClinicalMedicine, Jan. 2024, v. 67, 102387en_US
dcterms.isPartOfEClinicalMedicineen_US
dcterms.issued2024-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85181824454-
dc.identifier.eissn2589-5370en_US
dc.identifier.artn102387en_US
dc.description.validate202406 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2869-
dc.identifier.SubFormID48600-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextAustralian Government: the National Critical Research Infrastructure Initiative; Medical Research Future Fund; NHMRC Investigator Granten_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S2589537023005643-main.pdf2.36 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

5
Citations as of Jun 30, 2024

Downloads

2
Citations as of Jun 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.