Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/107408
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Optometry-
dc.contributorResearch Centre for SHARP Vision-
dc.creatorChan, KYen_US
dc.creatorGuo, Ben_US
dc.creatorTse, JSHen_US
dc.creatorLi, PHen_US
dc.creatorCheong, AMen_US
dc.creatorNgo, Wen_US
dc.creatorLam, TCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-19T06:11:32Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-19T06:11:32Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/107408-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Chan, K. Y., Guo, B., Tse, J. S. H., Li, P. H., Cheong, A. M. Y., Ngo, W., & Lam, T. C. (2024). A cross-sectional study of optometrists' attitudes towards dry eye disease management in Hong Kong: A web-based survey in Hong Kong. Heliyon, 10(10), e31181 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31181.en_US
dc.subjectDry eyeen_US
dc.subjectEvidence-based practiceen_US
dc.subjectQuestionnaireen_US
dc.subjectSurveyen_US
dc.titleA cross-sectional study of optometrists' attitudes towards dry eye disease management in Hong Kong : a web-based survey in Hong Kongen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31181en_US
dcterms.abstractPurpose: This study aimed to explore the practices of optometrists in Hong Kong towards diagnosing and managing dry eye disease (DED).-
dcterms.abstractMethods: From September 2021 to March 2022, an online questionnaire was distributed to optometrists in Hong Kong through several professional associations. The questionnaire included questions about the importance and usefulness of various diagnostic tests, as well as inquiries about management strategies and recommended follow-up schedules for DED. Responses were compared between optometrists who were more or less proactive in continuing education to identify potential differences.-
dcterms.abstractResults: The analysis included 68 valid responses. Sixty-one of them were Part 1 optometrists that represents 5.5 % of registered Part 1 optometrists back in 2022. Assessment of clinical symptoms was the most commonly performed investigation (93 %) and considered the most important (75 %) procedure in DED assessments, followed by corneal staining and fluorescein tear break-up time. Traditional diagnostic tests were preferred over newer methods, such as osmolarity, which were not yet commonly used. Unpreserved lubricants (90 %) and lid hygiene (63 %) were the primary treatments recommended for mild DED. Optometrists who had more experience and frequent participation in continuing education were more confident in diagnosing and managing DED, and more likely to recommend omega-3 supplements for moderate DED.-
dcterms.abstractConclusion: The diagnostic and management strategies of optometrists in Hong Kong were generally consistent with the recommendations of the Dry Eye Workshop II report. However, standardized DED questionnaires and newer diagnostic tools were not commonly used. Evidence-based optometric care for dry eye management should be encouraged in Hong Kong optometric practice.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHeliyon, 30 May 2024, v. 10, no. 10, e31181en_US
dcterms.isPartOfHeliyonen_US
dcterms.issued2024-05-30-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85193265325-
dc.identifier.eissn2405-8440en_US
dc.identifier.artne31181en_US
dc.description.validate202406 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2842-
dc.identifier.SubFormID48557-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextInnoHK and the Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Regionen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S2405844024072128-main.pdf643.86 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

8
Citations as of Jun 30, 2024

Downloads

4
Citations as of Jun 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.