Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/107298
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Nursing-
dc.creatorWang, Sen_US
dc.creatorHuang, Yen_US
dc.creatorFan, AYNen_US
dc.creatorHo, MHen_US
dc.creatorDavidson, PMen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-13T01:05:52Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-13T01:05:52Z-
dc.identifier.issn1445-8330en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/107298-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.en_US
dc.subjectCaregiveren_US
dc.subjectDementiaen_US
dc.subjectDyaden_US
dc.subjectPsychosocial well-beingen_US
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen_US
dc.titleFactors influencing the psychosocial well-being of people with dementia and their informal caregivers : a systematic review of dyadic studiesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage560en_US
dc.identifier.epage581en_US
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/inm.13279en_US
dcterms.abstractIndividuals with dementia and their informal caregivers face significant challenges to their psychosocial well-being, necessitating immediate attention. In spite of the prevalence of this problem, there is limited data regarding the factors that influence the dyadic psychosocial well-being and potential actor–partner influencing mechanisms. Therefore, this review was conducted to synthesise the factors associated with the psychosocial well-being of people with dementia and their informal caregivers. MEDLINE via EBSCOhost, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase and Scopus were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Quantitative, qualitative or mixed-method studies examining the factors influencing dyadic psychosocial well-being outcomes were included. The quality of included studies was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal checklists. A narrative synthesis approach was employed for data analysis. A total of 3217 records were yield, out of which 26 studies were included in the analysis. Quality of life emerged as the most extensively investigated dyadic psychosocial well-being outcome, followed by depression. The interrelation between the quality of life for people with dementia and caregivers was observed, where individual members' quality of life was influenced by their own, partner and dyadic factors. However, there is a dearth of research exploring the mechanisms through which one member's factors exert influence on both their own and partner's quality of life within the dyad. This gap also exists for other psychosocial well-being outcomes, such as depression and anxiety. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms through which dyadic members influence their own and their partner's psychosocial well-being.-
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of mental health nursing, June 2024, v. 33, no. 3, p. 560-581en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of mental health nursingen_US
dcterms.issued2024-06-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85180244437-
dc.identifier.eissn1447-0349en_US
dc.description.validate202406 bcch-
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2806-
dc.identifier.SubFormID48432-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextNational Natural Science Foundation of Chinaen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2025-06-30en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2025-06-30
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

16
Citations as of Jun 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.