Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/107294
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studies-
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering-
dc.creatorZhang, L-
dc.creatorXu, M-
dc.creatorWang, S-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-13T01:05:50Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-13T01:05:50Z-
dc.identifier.issn0968-090X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/107294-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectCascading failure controlen_US
dc.subjectLarge-scale bus transit networken_US
dc.subjectLink additionen_US
dc.subjectLoad-capacity modelen_US
dc.subjectNetwork dynamicsen_US
dc.titleImproving robustness of large-scale bus transit networks against cascading failures : a preventive control or an emergency control?en_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume162-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.trc.2024.104602-
dcterms.abstractCascading failures of large-scale bus transit networks (LBTNs) often lead to extreme rather than general network performance issues from a network dynamics perspective. Previous studies mostly concentrated on modeling the unfolding process of cascading failures, while little attention was given to controlling such failures, particularly under emergencies. This paper addresses an open problem: is it preferable to employ a preventive control before cascading failures, or to implement an emergency control for real-time cascading failures? Specifically, an emergency route relinking approach that dispatches internal resources (redundancy) without adding external resources (investment) is proposed to handle the operational disruptions caused by cascading failures. Remarkably, an intermediate process, namely non-emergency route relinking, is formulated to reconcile the different study frameworks between the two types of controls, premised on clarifying their differences and interdependencies. This formulation ensures the transition from preventive to emergency controls, as well as from traditional link addition to emergency route relinking. Furthermore, utilizing topological knowledge from network science and operational knowledge from transportation engineering, non-emergency and emergency route relinking strategies are designed to compare the control performance between the two types of controls and among emergency strategies. Case results indicate that (i) The emergency control is better than the preventive control, and operational knowledge is more effective than topological knowledge; (ii) It is insufficient to solely regulate real-time unfolding paths by evacuating failure loads to bypass specific areas, attention should also be given to planning redundancy to reduce the scale of failure loads and handle the adverse fluctuations in failure strength caused by the redundancy dispatching process. This work offers valuable insights into real-world emergency management and an underlying simulator with verified domain knowledge for intelligent control in mega-scale networks.-
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTransportation research. Part C, Emerging technologies, May 2024, v. 162, 104602-
dcterms.isPartOfTransportation research. Part C, Emerging technologies-
dcterms.issued2024-05-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85189854105-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-2359-
dc.identifier.artn104602-
dc.description.validate202406 bcch-
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2804aen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID48427en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextNational Natural Science Foundation of Chinaen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2026-05-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2026-05-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

7
Citations as of Jun 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.