Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/107029
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studies-
dc.creatorWang, AMY-
dc.creatorAu, CWS-
dc.creatorChan, A-
dc.creatorMomenian, M-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-07T08:55:29Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-07T08:55:29Z-
dc.identifier.issn0093-934X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/107029-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAcademic Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Wong, A. M. Y., Au, C. W. S., Chan, A., & Momenian, M. (2024). A comparison of learning and retention of a syntactic construction between Cantonese-speaking children with and without DLD in a priming task. Brain and Language, 251, 105404 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105404.en_US
dc.subjectCantoneseen_US
dc.subjectDevelopmental language disorderen_US
dc.subjectDLDen_US
dc.subjectLearningen_US
dc.subjectRetentionen_US
dc.subjectSyntactic primingen_US
dc.titleA comparison of learning and retention of a syntactic construction between Cantonese-speaking children with and without DLD in a priming tasken_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume251-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105404-
dcterms.abstractProcedural circuit Deficit Hypothesis (PDH) of Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) predicts problems with learning and retention of grammar. Twenty 7- to 9-year-old Cantonese-speaking children with DLD and their typically developing (TD) age peers participated in a syntactic priming task that was given in two sessions one week apart. Production of Indirect Object Relative Clause (IORC) was tested using a probe test before and after the priming task, and one week later. The study involved two cycles of learning and retention, and two levels of prior knowledge. Bayesian linear mixed effects modelling was used for data analysis. Children with DLD learned, and possibly retained, IORC less well than TD children after age, working memory and general grammatical knowledge were controlled for. No interaction effects were significant, meaning that cycle and prior knowledge affected both groups similarly in learning and retention. Results were discussed in relation to PDH and the Complementary Learning Systems Theory.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBrain and language, Apr. 2024, v. 251, 105404-
dcterms.isPartOfBrain and language-
dcterms.issued2024-04-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85188551045-
dc.identifier.eissn1090-2155-
dc.identifier.artn105404-
dc.description.validate202406 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2787en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID48330en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0093934X24000270-main.pdf2.07 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

11
Citations as of Jun 30, 2024

Downloads

5
Citations as of Jun 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.