Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/106793
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciences-
dc.creatorAu, A-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-04T07:39:48Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-04T07:39:48Z-
dc.identifier.issn2029-4913-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/106793-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical Universityen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Au, A. (2024). How do different forms of digitalization affect income inequality?. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 30(3), 667–687 is available at https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2024.20562.en_US
dc.subjectdigitalizationen_US
dc.subjectincome inequalityen_US
dc.subjecthuman capitalen_US
dc.subjectbroadband connectivityen_US
dc.subjectsmall and medium enterprisesen_US
dc.subjectpublic servicesen_US
dc.titleHow do different forms of digitalization affect income inequality?en_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage667-
dc.identifier.epage687-
dc.identifier.volume30-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.doi10.3846/tede.2024.20562-
dcterms.abstractThis article examines how different forms of digitalization affect inequality in Europe. Using a cross-national dataset of economic development and digitalization across a range of regression specifications including country and time fixed effects, this article explores the heterogeneous relationships of disparate forms of digitalization – human capital, broadband connectivity, integration of digital technology into small and medium enterprises, and digital public services – with income inequality. Fixed country and time effects models show that only the digitalization of human capital and integration of digital technology by SMEs are associated with decreases in income inequality. Causal mediation analysis reveals that tertiary education, despite its oft-cited connection to digital technology uptake, has no causal effect on the pathways through which digitalization of labour and SME operations lower inequality, which are direct. The findings tentatively suggest that there exist informal sources of digital skills training apart from formal tertiary education and point to SMEs as a potentially impactful area for investing in digitalization as pathways for income redistribution.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTechnological and economic development of economy, 22 May 2024, v. 30, no. 2, p. 667-687-
dcterms.isPartOfTechnological and economic development of economy-
dcterms.issued2024-05-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001185974600001-
dc.identifier.eissn2029-4921-
dc.description.validate202406 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2744en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID48205en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextDepartment of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
20562-Article Text-84238-3-10-20240528.pdf362.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

4
Citations as of Jun 30, 2024

Downloads

4
Citations as of Jun 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.