Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/106704
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Nursing-
dc.creatorAbu-Odah, H-
dc.creatorChan, EA-
dc.creatorMolassiotis, A-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-03T02:11:39Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-03T02:11:39Z-
dc.identifier.issn0162-220X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/106704-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.subjectBarriersen_US
dc.subjectCanceren_US
dc.subjectCaregiversen_US
dc.subjectCommunicationen_US
dc.subjectDecision-makingen_US
dc.subjectFacilitatorsen_US
dc.subjectFactorsen_US
dc.subjectHealthcare professional participationen_US
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen_US
dc.titleFactors impacting on patient-centered communication skills and their opportunities to be involved in decision-making from the perspective of patients with cancer, informal caregivers, and/or healthcare professionals : a systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/NCC.0000000000001357-
dcterms.abstractBackground : Active participation of cancer patients and their caregivers in decision-making, along with high-quality communication, is crucial in patient-centered cancer management. Although numerous factors affecting patients’ communication and decision-making involvement have been identified, it is still unclear which ones are the most prevalent and critical.-
dcterms.abstractObjective : To identify factors that contribute to high-quality patient-centered communication and decision-making participation from the perspectives of cancer patients, informal caregivers, and/or healthcare professionals.-
dcterms.abstractMethods : A systematic review was conducted, using 9 databases to retrieve primary research articles published from 2010 to February 17, 2023, updated on December 13, 2023. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (version 18). The socioecological model of communication was utilized as analytical framework for summarizing the results.-
dcterms.abstractResults : Fifty-two studies were included. The most frequently reported factors were predominantly articulated at the individual, interpersonal, and societal levels. Although the patients’ lack of knowledge and limited language proficiency were the frequent patient-level barriers, the perceived lack of knowledge and lack of training of professionals were the crucial and current professional-level barriers, as reported in studies published in 2016 onward. To circumvent these factors, it is critical to enhance professionals’ knowledge, communication skills, and patient relationships.-
dcterms.abstractConclusions : Recognizing barriers and facilitators could help in the development of strategies to overcome these barriers and enhance patient participation in clinical communication.-
dcterms.abstractImplication for Practice : The findings could guide the development of programs to enhance patient-professional communication skills. Further cross-cultural studies are needed to understand culture’s impact on communication effectiveness and decision-making participation.-
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCancer nursing, April 23, 2024, Ahead-of-Print, https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000001357-
dcterms.isPartOfCancer nursing-
dcterms.issued2024-
dc.identifier.eissn1538-9804-
dc.description.validate202405 bcch-
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2730en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID48150en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusEarly releaseen_US
dc.date.embargo0000-00-00 (to be updated)en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 0000-00-00 (to be updated)
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

7
Citations as of Jun 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.