Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/106681
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciences-
dc.creatorLan, X-
dc.creatorKu, HB-
dc.creatorZhan, Y-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-03T02:10:09Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-03T02:10:09Z-
dc.identifier.issn0012-155X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/106681-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.en_US
dc.rights© 2024 The Authors. Development and Change published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalfof Institute of Social Studies.en_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCom-mercial-NoDerivs License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided theoriginal work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptationsare made.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Lan, X., Ku, H.B. and Zhan, Y. (2024), Aesthetic Governance and China's Rural Toilet Revolution. Dev Change, 55: 219-243 is available at https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12823.en_US
dc.titleAesthetic governance and China's rural toilet revolutionen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage219-
dc.identifier.epage243-
dc.identifier.volume55-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/dech.12823-
dcterms.abstractThis article addresses aesthetic politics in the Chinese rural toilet revolution. Toilet retrofitting is conventionally regarded as an issue of sanitation improvement, but in the emerging trend of rural post-productivism transformation, toilets have become contested sites of aesthetic governance in rural development. Using the case of a village in Northern China, the authors show that, in order to beautify the rural environment, toilet identification, selection, placement and demolition are all directed by aesthetic norms for a beautiful village. Additionally, the aestheticization of village development has legitimized state-led development by creating a common-sense understanding of and imagination for the future. However, aesthetic logics can represent a mismatch with the realities of local lives, resulting in place alienation and suspended development. This article unpacks the logics, mechanisms and spatial-social processes of aesthetic governance in the Chinese toilet revolution.-
dcterms.accessRightsOpen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDevelopment and change, Mar. 2024, v. 55, no. 2, p. 219-243-
dcterms.isPartOfDevelopment and change-
dcterms.issued2024-03-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85191358305-
dc.identifier.eissn1467-7660-
dc.description.validate202405 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_TAen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextPeking University-Hong Kong Polytechnic University China Social Work Research Centre; Practice Research on Developing Indigenous Social Work in China and Belt & Road Regionsen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.TAWiley (2024)en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryTAen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lan_Aesthetic_Governance_China.pdf415.96 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status Open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

127
Last Week
10
Last month
Citations as of Apr 12, 2026

Downloads

202
Citations as of Apr 12, 2026

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
Citations as of May 8, 2026

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
Citations as of Apr 23, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.