Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/106623
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorWang, Zen_US
dc.creatorYu, JGen_US
dc.creatorChen, Aen_US
dc.creatorFu, Xen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-20T08:40:45Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-20T08:40:45Z-
dc.identifier.issn0967-070Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/106623-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectEnergy transitionen_US
dc.subjectPolicy implicationsen_US
dc.subjectSubsidyen_US
dc.subjectSystem dynamics|\Technical-economic analysisen_US
dc.subjectZero-emission busen_US
dc.titleSubsidy policies towards zero-emission bus fleets : a systematic technical-economic analysisen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1en_US
dc.identifier.epage13en_US
dc.identifier.volume150en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.02.022en_US
dcterms.abstractWe establish a bus market evolution model to explore the implications of subsidy policies in Hong Kong (HK) for the transition to a zero-emission bus (ZEB) fleet using an unsubsidized case as the benchmark scenario. Using the system dynamics (SD) approach, we capture the intricate feedback mechanisms among market share dynamics, cost considerations, consumer preferences, and competitive interactions within the bus market. These interactions are encapsulated within three pivotal feedback loops: scale economy, public acceptance, and bus market competition. We systematically integrate the HK-specific features of hydrogen buses (H-buses), battery electric buses (E-buses), and diesel buses (D-buses) from technical and economic perspectives and compare them to the benchmark scenario. The results show that only 66% of the bus fleet would be ZEBs by 2050, and this underscores the necessity for governmental financial incentives to expedite the transition to a fully zero-emission fleet. Furthermore, we evaluate various ZEB subsidy policy alternatives in terms of timing, intensity, and recipients. The analysis suggests that policies offering long-term and low-intensity subsidies are most beneficial, taking into account the cumulative effects and inherent delays associated with policy implementation. Importantly, the study highlights the critical balance that policymakers must achieve between short- and long-term objectives, especially given the counter-intuitive outcomes observed in the early stages of policies favoring H-buses exclusively. This study provides valuable policy insights for policymakers and upstream energy companies in HK, with potential applicability in wider real-world contexts.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTransport policy, May 2024, v. 150, p. 1-13en_US
dcterms.isPartOfTransport policyen_US
dcterms.issued2024-05-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85187212393-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-310Xen_US
dc.description.validate202405 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2710b-
dc.identifier.SubFormID48100-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextProject of Strategic Importance; Research Institute of Sustainable Urban Development; Faculty of Engineeringen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2026-05-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2026-05-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

1
Citations as of Jun 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.