Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/106621
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorKurmankhojayev, Den_US
dc.creatorLi, Gen_US
dc.creatorChen, Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-20T08:40:45Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-20T08:40:45Z-
dc.identifier.issn0951-8320en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/106621-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectDemand elasticityen_US
dc.subjectLink criticality indexen_US
dc.subjectStochastic user equilibriumen_US
dc.subjectVulnerability analysisen_US
dc.titleLink criticality index : refinement, framework extension, and a case studyen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume243en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ress.2023.109889en_US
dcterms.abstractThe link criticality index (LCI) is a network performance-based measure that assesses criticality of network links based on flow fluctuations during traffic assignment. Unlike other network performance-based methods, LCI does not require link removal or multiple traffic assignments, and can account for topology, redundancy, congestion, and traveler behavior. However, the original LCI is based on a deterministic user equilibrium (UE) framework, which may lead to two issues: (i) a link's criticality index can be affected by origin-destination (O-D) pairs even if their demand is routed away from the link and (ii) identical links can be ranked unequally. In this paper, we suggest a refinement to the functional form of LCI to cater to analysts who prefer to work within the UE framework; and we extend the LCI measure to stochastic user equilibrium (SUE) and SUE with elastic demand (ED). These extensions resolve the issues related to UE-based LCI and add to the behavioral realism of the network model. To demonstrate validity of concept, the resulting LCI measure is applied to assess the criticality of bridges in Winnipeg, Canada. The obtained results are reasonable and consistent with the previous methods based on the full-network scan approach.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationReliability engineering and system safety, Mar. 2024, v. 243, 109889en_US
dcterms.isPartOfReliability engineering and system safetyen_US
dcterms.issued2024-03-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85180404457-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-0836en_US
dc.identifier.artn109889en_US
dc.description.validate202405 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2710a-
dc.identifier.SubFormID48098-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering; Research Institute for Sustainable Urban Developmenten_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2026-03-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2026-03-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

7
Citations as of Jun 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.