Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/106575
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Mechanical Engineering-
dc.creatorWen, X-
dc.creatorTang, H-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-09T00:54:24Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-09T00:54:24Z-
dc.identifier.issn1343-8875-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/106575-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rights© The Visualization Society of Japan 2015en_US
dc.rightsThis version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use(https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/accepted-manuscript-terms), but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-015-0291-0.en_US
dc.subjectDye visualizationen_US
dc.subjectHairpin vorticesen_US
dc.subjectIn-line twin synthetic jetsen_US
dc.subjectParticle image velocimetryen_US
dc.subjectPhase differenceen_US
dc.titleEffect of phase difference on the interaction of hairpin vortices induced by in-line twin synthetic jetsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage79-
dc.identifier.epage87-
dc.identifier.volume19-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12650-015-0291-0-
dcterms.abstractAn experimental study is carried out to investigate the effect of operational phase difference of in-line twin synthetic jet actuators (SJAs) on the interaction of synthetic jet-induced hairpin vortices. The resulting vortex structures at four phase differences, i.e., Δϕ = 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°, are presented and compared using both stereo dye visualization and particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements. Three types of vortex structures are observed: one combined vortex at Δϕ = 90°, two completely separated hairpin vortices at Δϕ = 270°, and partially interacting vortex structures at Δϕ = 0° and 180°. The combined vortex is the strongest and most penetrates into the boundary layer. The completely separated hairpin vortices are the closest to the wall and hence are able to exert the most influence in the near-wall region. As for the partially interacting vortex structures, the head of one hairpin vortex interacts with legs of the other, producing complex vortex structures. Through this study it is also found that hairpin vortices issued from the upstream SJA are able to maintain their coherence more easily than their counterparts issued from the downstream SJA, regardless the phase difference. The secondary vortices captured by the PIV measurements are also compared.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of visualization, Feb. 2016, v. 19, no. 1, p. 79-87-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of visualization-
dcterms.issued2016-02-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84954361234-
dc.identifier.eissn1875-8975-
dc.description.validate202405 bcch-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberME-1042en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6607903en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Tang_Effect_Phase_Difference.pdfPre-Published version1.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

9
Citations as of Jun 30, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
Citations as of Jun 27, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
Citations as of Jun 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.