Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/106466
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Mechanical Engineering-
dc.creatorLam, GCY-
dc.creatorLeung, RCK-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-09T00:53:43Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-09T00:53:43Z-
dc.identifier.issn0001-1452-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/106466-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2018 by Garret C. Y. Lam and Randolph C. K. Leung. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission.en_US
dc.rightsThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Lam, G. C. Y., & Leung, R. C. K. (2018). Aeroacoustics of NACA 0018 Airfoil with a Cavity. AIAA Journal, 56(12), 4775-4786, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056389.en_US
dc.titleAeroacoustics of NACA 0018 airfoil with a cavityen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage4775-
dc.identifier.epage4786-
dc.identifier.volume56-
dc.identifier.issue12-
dc.identifier.doi10.2514/1.J056389-
dcterms.abstractThis paper reports a detailed numerical study of the aeroacoustics of a NACA 0018 airfoil with acavity at zero angle of attack, with chord-based Reynolds and freestream Mach numbers at 2 × 10⁴ and 0.2, in two dimensions. For an airfoil without a cavity, vortex shedding from the trailing edge and low-frequency wake flapping are found to be the major aeroacoustic processes. The presence of a cavity introduces additional acoustic generation due to cavity oscillation modes but weakens the noise sourceatthe airfoil trailing edge viaajittering of the flow. Three aeroacoustic mechanisms are identified with extensive fast Fourier transform, wavelet, and coherence analyses. The airfoil with cavity effectively increases the lift-to-drag ratio from almost zero (ordinary airfoil) to approximately 5.3. However, it radiates less acoustic power by 1.2 and by 2.6 dB from the airfoil upper and lower surfaces, respectively, even if the acoustic contribution of wake flapping of the ordinary airfoil is excluded. The outcomes of the study suggest that an airfoil with a cavity is a feasible configuration that gives high lift-to-drag ratio yet low noise generation, making it a promising quiet airfoil design at low Reynolds number.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAIAA journal, Dec. 2018, v. 56, no. 12, p. 4775-4786-
dcterms.isPartOfAIAA journal-
dcterms.issued2018-12-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85051299084-
dc.identifier.eissn1533-385X-
dc.description.validate202405 bcch-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberME-0560en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextPhilip K. H. Wong Foundation; The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration of Shanghai Jiao Tong Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS21779134en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lam_Aeroacoustics_Naca_Airfoil.pdfPre-Published version19.3 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

10
Citations as of Jun 30, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

15
Citations as of Jul 4, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
Citations as of Jul 4, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.