Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/105997
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering-
dc.creatorYazdani, M-
dc.creatorAbdi, MR-
dc.creatorKumar, N-
dc.creatorKeshavarzGhorabaee, M-
dc.creatorChan, FTS-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T02:01:49Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-24T02:01:49Z-
dc.identifier.issn0733-9364-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/105997-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineersen_US
dc.rights©2019 American Society of Civil Engineersen_US
dc.rightsThis material may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the American Society of Civil Engineers. This material may be found at https://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001640.en_US
dc.subjectConstruction projectsen_US
dc.subjectFailure mode and effect analysisen_US
dc.subjectFuzzy analytical network processen_US
dc.subjectMulticriteria decisionsen_US
dc.subjectRisk assessmenten_US
dc.titleImproved decision model for evaluating risks in construction projectsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume145-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001640-
dcterms.abstractThe paper develops an innovative risk evaluation methodology to address the challenges of multicriteria decision-making problem of project evaluation and selection. The methodology considers the fuzzy analytic network process (FANP) to incorporate the interdependencies of different risk factors, and failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) to conduct the rating analysis of projects to develop the decision matrix. Finally, evaluation based on the distance from the average solution compares alternative projects and reports the optimal solution. The proposed approach allows project managers to engage in the evaluation process and to use fuzzy linguistic values in the assessment process. A case study from the construction sector is selected to verify the efficacy of the proposed approach over other popular approaches in the literature.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of construction engineering and management, May 2019, v. 145, no. 5, 04019024-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of construction engineering and management-
dcterms.issued2019-05-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85062029535-
dc.identifier.eissn1943-7862-
dc.identifier.artn04019024-
dc.description.validate202404 bcwh-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberISE-0476en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS14423428en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chan_Improved_Decision_Model.pdfPre-Published version1.34 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

64
Citations as of May 12, 2024

Downloads

59
Citations as of May 12, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

36
Citations as of May 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.