Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/105802
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering-
dc.creatorWang, W-
dc.creatorTian, W-
dc.creatorChau, K-
dc.creatorZang, H-
dc.creatorMa, M-
dc.creatorFeng, Z-
dc.creatorXu, D-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-23T04:31:25Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-23T04:31:25Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/105802-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Wang W, Tian W, Chau K, Zang H, Ma M, Feng Z, Xu D. Multi-Reservoir Flood Control Operation Using Improved Bald Eagle Search Algorithm with ε Constraint Method. Water. 2023; 15(4):692 is available at https://doi.org/10.3390/w15040692.en_US
dc.subjectBald eagle search algorithmen_US
dc.subjectFlood control operationen_US
dc.subjectMulti-reservoiren_US
dc.subjectPenalty function methoden_US
dc.subjectΕ constraint methoden_US
dc.titleMulti-reservoir flood control operation using improved bald eagle search algorithm with ε constraint methoden_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume15-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/w15040692-
dcterms.abstractThe reservoir flood control operation problem has the characteristics of multiconstraint, high-dimension, nonlinearity, and being difficult to solve. In order to better solve this problem, this paper proposes an improved bald eagle search algorithm (CABES) coupled with ε-constraint method (ε-CABES). In order to test the performance of the CABES algorithm, a typical test function is used to simulate and verify CABES. The results are compared with the bald eagle algorithm and particle swarm optimization algorithm to verify its superiority. In order to further test the rationality and effectiveness of the CABES method, two single reservoirs and a multi-reservoir system are selected for flood control operation, and the ε constraint method and the penalty function method (CF-CABES) are compared, respectively. Results show that peak clipping rates of ε-CABES and CF-CABES are both 60.28% for Shafan Reservoir and 52.03% for Dahuofang Reservoir, respectively. When solving the multi-reservoir joint flood control operation system, only ε-CABES flood control operation is successful, and the peak clipping rate is 51.76%. Therefore, in the single-reservoir flood control operation, the penalty function method and the ε constraint method have similar effects. However, in multi-reservoir operation, the ε constraint method is better than the penalty function method. In summary, the ε-CABES algorithm is more reliable and effective, which provides a new method for solving the joint flood control scheduling problem of large reservoirs.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWater (Switzerland), Feb. 2023, v. 15, no. 4, 692-
dcterms.isPartOfWater (Switzerland)-
dcterms.issued2023-02-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85149236244-
dc.identifier.eissn2073-4441-
dc.identifier.artn692-
dc.description.validate202404 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextProject of key science and technology of the Henan province; Henan province university scientific and technological innovation teamen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
water-15-00692-v2.pdf4.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

8
Citations as of Jun 30, 2024

Downloads

1
Citations as of Jun 30, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
Citations as of Jul 4, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
Citations as of Jul 4, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.