Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/105443
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Designen_US
dc.creatorLuximon, Yen_US
dc.creatorShah, Pen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-12T06:54:19Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-12T06:54:19Z-
dc.identifier.issn0549-4974en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/105443-
dc.description2nd Asian Conference on Ergonomics and Design 2017, June 1-4, 2017, Japanen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJapan Human Factors and Ergonomics Societyen_US
dc.rightsPosted with permission of the publisher.en_US
dc.subject3D scannersen_US
dc.subjectHead and faceen_US
dc.subjectProduct designen_US
dc.subjectComforten_US
dc.subjectFiten_US
dc.titleEffect of the accuracy of 3D head scanners in product design developmenten_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spageS372en_US
dc.identifier.epageS375en_US
dc.identifier.volume53en_US
dc.identifier.issueSupplement 2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5100/jje.53.S372en_US
dcterms.abstractHuman head needs to be protected from any risk as multiple sensory organs are located there. Hence it is very important to design products with a high level of comfort and fit in order for the product to perform its function. With the advancement of 3D scanning facilities, it is possible to acquire highly accurate and precise surface contour which can be used for designing customized products. With the availability of wide range of 3D scanners, it is necessary to evaluate the user experience of products developed from different scanners based on their accuracy and precision in scanning. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of accuracy of three 3D scanners in product designing and evaluating user’s comfort and fit parameters for the developed products. Participants were scanned using three different 3D scanners (Artec Eva 3D scanner, Cyberware 3030 color scanner and Structure sensor scanner). A mask frame was developed from every scan and then 3D printed for evaluation. The individuals were made to evaluate the designed mask frame to understand their comfort and fit experience. Based on the responses from the participants it was found that the mask frame developed from the scan acquired from Artec Eva 3D scanner was found to be the most comfortable one and had the best fit. The scans acquired from Cyberware 3030 color scanner had missing data and was reported slightly dissatisfaction on fit. The scans from the Structure sensor lacked precision and fine details, and the frame got the lowest rating at comfort level.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationThe Japanese journal of ergonomics, 2017, v. 53, supp. 2, p. S372-S3755en_US
dcterms.isPartOfThe Japanese journal of ergonomicsen_US
dcterms.issued2021-
dc.relation.conferenceAsian Conference on Ergonomics and Designen_US
dc.identifier.eissn1884-2844en_US
dc.description.validate202404 bcwhen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberSD-0237-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS23625615-
dc.description.oaCategoryPublisher permissionen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
53_S372.pdf703 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

12
Citations as of Jul 7, 2024

Downloads

3
Citations as of Jul 7, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.