Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/105313
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorCollege of Professional and Continuing Education-
dc.creatorHu, R-
dc.creatorLau, YY-
dc.creatorWang, R-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-12T06:51:35Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-12T06:51:35Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/105313-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMolecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)en_US
dc.rights© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Hu R, Lau Y-Y, Wang R. Evaluation of Customs Supervision Competitiveness Using Principal Component Analysis. Sustainability. 2023; 15(3):1833 is available at https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031833.en_US
dc.subjectCustoms administrationen_US
dc.subjectCustoms controlen_US
dc.subjectInternational customs supervision competitivenessen_US
dc.subjectWorld Customs Organization Revised Kyoto Conventionen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of customs supervision competitiveness using principal component analysisen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume15-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su15031833-
dcterms.abstractIn order to improve the degree of security and facilitation of the business environment; customs administrations are constantly working to strengthen their own institutional innovation and governance in customs control. As such, this paper establishes an evaluation index of international customs supervision competitiveness based on the eight indexes extracted from the World Customs Organisation (WCO) Revised Kyoto Convention and selects 21 representative national customs using the principal component analysis (PCA) method to assess their competitiveness against SPSSAU quantitatively. Based on the data from the World Economic Forum, World Bank, OECD, WCO Annual Report, and Transparency International, the Dutch customs have relatively the best performance in the range of comprehensive competitiveness, and customs authorities in Germany, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, the United States, Mexico, Australia, the Netherlands, and Singapore also have relatively-best performance under different indexes. Taking China Customs as an example, the gaps between China Customs and the ones with the best performance are also analyzed. In response to the problems identified by the analysis, recommendations are made in the areas of process facilitation, technology application, international cooperation, economic development, taxation management, and capacity building to improve the competitiveness of customs control.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSustainability, Feb. 2023, v. 15, no. 3, 1833-
dcterms.isPartOfSustainability-
dcterms.issued2023-02-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85147859500-
dc.identifier.eissn2071-1050-
dc.identifier.artn1833-
dc.description.validate202403 bcvc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextGeneral Administration of Customs P.R. Chinaen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
sustainability-15-01833-v3.pdf302.13 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

18
Citations as of Jul 7, 2024

Downloads

11
Citations as of Jul 7, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.