Comparison of GRACE/GRACE-FO spherical harmonic and mascon products in interpreting GNSS vertical loading deformations over the Amazon Basin

Abstract

We compute the vertical displacements in the Amazon Basin using the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On (GRACE-FO) observations, including both the gravity spherical harmonic (SH) solutions from the Center for Space Research (CSR), GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ) and Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and mascons from CSR, JPL and Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). The correlation coefficients, annual amplitude and root mean squares (RMS) reductions are calculated to assess the agreements between the GRACE/GRACE-FO and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) vertical displacements at 22 selected GNSS stations. For the six GRACE/GRACE-FO products (i.e., CSR SH, GFZ SH, JPL SH, CSR mascon, GSFC mascon and JPL mascon), the mean annual amplitude reductions are 77.6%, 76.4%, 76.3%, 78.6%, 78.5% and 76.6%, respectively, the corresponding mean RMS reductions are 63.2%, 61.7%, 62.3%, 64.9%, 65.3% and 63.8%, respectively, and the mean correlation coefficients are all over 0.93. On the whole, mascon solutions agree slightly better with GNSS solutions than SH solutions do. The CSR SH and the GSFC mascon solutions show the best agreements with the GNSS solution among the 3 SH and 3 mascon products, respectively. We estimate GRACE/GRACE-FO noises using the three-cornered hat (TCH) method and find that the CSR SH and GSFC mascons also have the smallest noise variances among the SH and mascon products, respectively. By analyzing the GNSS stations from the central and southern Amazon Basin, we find that: (1) the RMS reductions when the mascon solutions are removed from GNSS height series are slightly larger than those using the SH solutions in the center, while in south all the RMS reductions are fairly close; (2) for both SH solutions and mascon solutions, the correlation coefficients in the center are slightly larger than those in the south, but conversely, the mean annual amplitude reductions in the center are much smaller than those in the south.