Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/105138
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Design-
dc.creatorSiu, KWM-
dc.creatorXiao, JX-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-03T01:46:28Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-03T01:46:28Z-
dc.identifier.issn1871-2584-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/105138-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rights© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2015en_US
dc.rightsThis version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use (https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/accepted-manuscript-terms), but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11482-015-9426-7.en_US
dc.subjectHigh-rise buildingsen_US
dc.subjectLiving environmentsen_US
dc.subjectPublic designen_US
dc.subjectQuality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectRecyclingen_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.titleQuality of life and recycling behaviour in high-rise buildings : a case in Hong Kongen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1137-
dc.identifier.epage1154-
dc.identifier.volume11-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11482-015-9426-7-
dcterms.abstractMany researchers, environmentalists and economists have made tremendous efforts to enable polices and measures for waste recycling, to improve the quality of the public living environment and to achieve a better quality of everyday life. This study examined the quality of life (QOL) in high-rise buildings in relation to sustainability. It investigated household recycling behaviour and explored the QOL factors that affect such behaviour. Two models based on different types of recycling behaviour were estimated: 1) a model for the use of public recycling facilities (UPRF) and 2) a model for the use of private recycling sectors (UPRS). Data were collected through a survey of 505 residents in two old districts of Hong Kong. The assessment of QOL included consideration for the physical settings, the socio-demographic variables and the respondents’ attitudes on recycling and living environments. The research methods involved questionnaires and interviews. Correlations and multiple regression analyses were conducted to interpret the data collected through the questionnaires. The findings indicated that UPRF can be significantly predicted by physical settings and by satisfaction with the location of facilities, with the residents’ participation and with the quality of the neighbourhood and accommodation. UPRS can be significantly predicted by housing type, income and the availability of private recycling sectors. These findings also indicate some directions for researchers and policymakers to consider. These directions concern how environments and public facilities should be designed to encourage sustainable behaviour and enable a better QOL without compromising environmental sustainability.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationApplied research in quality of life, Dec. 2016, v. 11, no. 4, p. 1137-1154-
dcterms.isPartOfApplied research in quality of life-
dcterms.issued2016-12-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84941360667-
dc.identifier.eissn1871-2576-
dc.description.validate202402 bckw-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberSD-0265en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6578539en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Siu_Quality_Life_Recycling.pdfPre-Published version1.25 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

21
Citations as of Jul 7, 2024

Downloads

6
Citations as of Jul 7, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

14
Citations as of Jul 4, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
Citations as of Jul 4, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.