Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/105120
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Designen_US
dc.creatorNavarro, LTen_US
dc.creatorBruyns, Gen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-03T01:46:22Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-03T01:46:22Z-
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-646-99249-5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/105120-
dc.description1st Annual Design Research Conference (ADR18), The University of Sydney, 27 - 28 September 2018en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Sydneyen_US
dc.rights© 2018 The University of Sydneyen_US
dc.rightsThe copyright in these proceedings belongs to The University of Sydney. Copyright of the papers contained in these proceedings remains the property of the authors. Apart from fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this book may be reproduced by any process without the prior permission of the publishers and authors.en_US
dc.rightsPosted with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectInterior decoration/Interior design/Interior architecture/Environmental design/Built environmenten_US
dc.subjectInterior representationsen_US
dc.subjectHybrid drawingsen_US
dc.subjectInterior collagesen_US
dc.titleOn why we can not envision a tesseract : ‘unfolding’ the interior once more (reflections on three representational techniques for the design of the interior)en_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.spage553en_US
dc.identifier.epage568en_US
dcterms.abstractNarrowing in on the drawings made by the furniture maker Gillow and Co. (c.1806 - 1831), this text will examine the notion of hybridity as a tenable representational premise for the design of the interior within the digital age.en_US
dcterms.abstractStylistically, the link between Gillow and Co.’s work and current practices of interior representations exemplify an amalgamation of sorts. Where both showcases a multitude of drawing techniques harnessed to provide a synoptic impression of the interior in one drawing, as a point of departure, present-day interior projections—in particular, interior collages—emancipate both their mediums and representations in the process of hybridising drawing conventions and images as part of their design language.en_US
dcterms.abstractThis endeavour is a historiography of interior spatial representations that begins with the drawing of lines between interior decorators and upholsterers that occurred around the time of this ‘curiosity’ of a technique made its appearance (see Figure 2), to the rise of the professional interior designer and its reliance on the interior perspective render (see Figure 3), and of the practice’s continued ‘unfolding’ under the praxispractice of environmental design and its types of spatial experimentation (see Figure 5). This hybridity of conventions, images and of course, meanings have exposed latent possibilities that have become increasingly useful in the actual design of space in specific levels of scale—cutting across the spatial disciplines through this manner of either representation and lamination.en_US
dcterms.abstractBy rendering this history of interior spatial representation as a metaphor of the interior-as-box, this text ultimately aims at advancing how the interior collage as a means of representing the ‘design idea’ is reshaping how interior design notions echoes outwards to influence how other spatial designers conceptualise and design space today.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIn D. W. Maxwell (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1st Annual Design Research Conference (ADR18), The University of Sydney, 27 – 28 September 2018, p. 553-568. Sydney : University of Sydney, 2018en_US
dcterms.issued2018-
dc.relation.conferenceAnnual Design Research Conference [ADR]en_US
dc.publisher.placeSydneyen_US
dc.description.validate202403 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberSD-0219-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS22577520-
dc.description.oaCategoryCopyright retained by authoren_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Navarro_Why_We_Can.pdf1.05 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

148
Last Week
7
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

39
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.