Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/105039
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Designen_US
dc.creatorFu, Fen_US
dc.creatorLuximon, Yen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-03T01:45:52Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-03T01:45:52Z-
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-61208-761-0en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/105039-
dc.descriptionThe Thirteenth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (ACHI 2020), from November 21, 2020 to November 25, 2020, Valencia, Spainen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsCopyright (c) IARIA, 2020.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Fu, F., & Luximon, Y. (2020, November). Comparisons Among Different Types of Hearing Aids: A Pilot Study on Ergonomic Design of Hearing Aids. In Proceedings of ACHI 2020 : The Thirteenth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, November 21 – 25, 2020, Valencia, Spain, p. 277-279 is available at https://www.thinkmind.org/index.php?view=article&articleid=achi_2020_5_260_20133.en_US
dc.subjectHearing aidsen_US
dc.subjectProduct size and shapeen_US
dc.subjectFit and comforten_US
dc.titleComparisons among different types of hearing aids : a pilot study on ergonomic design of hearing aidsen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.spage277en_US
dc.identifier.epage279en_US
dcterms.abstractHearing aids are widely used by people with hearing loss. In the current market, various hearing aids can be selected based on the users’ demands. Previous research mostly concentrated on ear anthropometry and auditory function to explore fit and comfort of hearing aids. Even though Computer-Aided Design (CAD) simulation and virtual reality methods were used to examine the fit of earphones and specific hearing aids, how to achieve a proper fit for different types of hearing aids was not sufficiently studied. This study compares sizes and shapes among existing commercial hearing aids, and further proposes guidance in ear anthropometry for ergonomic design of hearing aids. Product parameters, including width, height, length, and weight, were measured for Behind-The-Ear (BTE) aids, In-The-Ear (ITE) aids, and In-The-Canal (ITC) aids individually. Selected hearing aids were fitted on the external ear of participants while recording their fit and comfort preferences. The findings of the study revealed the differences among BTE, ITE and ITC aids, and highlighted the anthropometric data for hearing aid design. Based on the findings of the study, potential research gaps were identified for future research.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIn Proceedings of ACHI 2020 : The Thirteenth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, November 21 – 25, 2020, Valencia, Spain, p. 277-279en_US
dcterms.issued2020-
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions [ACHI]en_US
dc.description.validate202403 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberSD-0061-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS23625008-
dc.description.oaCategoryVoR alloweden_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
achi_2020_5_260_20133.pdf358.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

66
Citations as of Apr 13, 2025

Downloads

23
Citations as of Apr 13, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.